Long-term follow-up MRI shows no hastening of adjacent segment degeneration following cervical disc arthroplasty

[1]  W. Reith,et al.  Adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical fusion and the presence of surgery for lumbar disc herniation and surgery at the musculoskeletal joints. Are they related? , 2020, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  S. Trattnig,et al.  In cervical arthroplasty, only prosthesis with flexible biomechanical properties should be used for achieving a near-physiological motion pattern , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[3]  F. Tamburrelli,et al.  Single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after 18 years of follow-up , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[4]  V. Traynelis,et al.  Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up. , 2020, Journal of spine surgery.

[5]  W. Reith,et al.  Is there a difference in the grade of degeneration at the cervical spine following anterior cervical fusion with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and repeat procedure? An MRI study of 102 patients with a mean follow-up of 25 years. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  W. Tian,et al.  Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy , 2019, Orthopaedic surgery.

[7]  William F Lavelle,et al.  Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial , 2019, Spine.

[8]  Daniel K. Park,et al.  Cervical Disk Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[9]  W. Reith,et al.  Is there an impact of cervical plating on the development of adjacent segment degeneration following Smith-Robinson procedure? A magnetic resonance imaging study of 84 patients with a 24-year follow-up. , 2018, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  W. Reith,et al.  Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With an Autologous Iliac Crest Graft: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of 59 Patients With a Mean Follow‐up of 27 Years , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[11]  Benedikt W. Burkhardt,et al.  Clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior cervical plating for the treatment of cervical disc herniation—a 25-year follow-up study , 2018, Neurosurgical Review.

[12]  K. Riew,et al.  Adjacent Level Degeneration: Bryan Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion , 2018, Clinical spine surgery.

[13]  M. Takemitsu,et al.  Upper Cervical Fusion in Children With Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia Congenita , 2017, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[14]  Benedikt W. Burkhardt,et al.  Smith-Robinson procedure with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A 26-year follow-up of 23 patients , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[15]  P. Demaerel,et al.  10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[16]  Benedikt W. Burkhardt,et al.  Smith-Robinson Procedure with an Autologous Iliac Crest for Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: A 28-Year Follow-Up of 95 Patients. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[17]  Fan Ding,et al.  Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in symptomatic cervical degenerative disc diseases (CDDDs): an updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[18]  Benedikt W. Burkhardt,et al.  Smith-Robinson Procedure with an Autologous Iliac Crest Graft and Caspar Plating: Report of 65 Patients with an Average Follow-up of 22 Years. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[19]  G. Lv,et al.  Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  Kee D. Kim,et al.  Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[21]  K. Riew,et al.  Adjacent Segment Pathology Requiring Reoperation After Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis: The Influence of Smoking, Sex, and Number of Operated Levels , 2015, Spine.

[22]  Hua-zi Xu,et al.  Minimum 4-Year Outcomes of Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion , 2015, Medicine.

[23]  K. Riew,et al.  Risk-factor analysis of adjacent-segment pathology requiring surgery following anterior, posterior, fusion, and nonfusion cervical spine operations: survivorship analysis of 1358 patients. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  J. Dettori,et al.  Predicting the Risk of Adjacent Segment Pathology in the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review , 2012, Spine.

[25]  R. Bartels,et al.  Long-term outcome after anterior cervical discectomy without fusion , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[26]  Tae-Hong Lim,et al.  Biomechanical Study on the Effect of Cervical Spine Fusion on Adjacent-Level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Motion , 2002, Spine.

[27]  Regis W Haid,et al.  The Cervical Spine Study Group anterior cervical plate nomenclature. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[28]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  R. B. Cloward.  The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  R. Robinson,et al.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.