Developing an Automated Gas Sampling Chamber for Measuring Variations in CO2 Exchange in a Maize Ecosystem at Night

The measurement of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of field maize at a plot-sized scale is of great significance for assessing carbon emissions. Chamber methods remain the sole approach for measuring NEE at a plot-sized scale. However, traditional chamber methods are disadvantaged by their high labor intensity, significant resultant changes in microclimate, and significant impact on the physiology of crops. Therefore, an automated portable chamber with an air humidity control system to determinate the nighttime variation of NEE in field maize was developed. The chamber system can automatically open and close the chamber, and regularly collect gas in the chamber for laboratory analysis. Furthermore, a humidity control system was created to control the air humidity of the chamber. Chamber performance test results show that the maximum difference between the temperature and humidity outside and inside the chamber was 0.457 °C and 5.6%, respectively, during the NEE measuring period. Inside the chamber, the leaf temperature fluctuation range and the maximum relative change of the maize leaf respiration rate were −0.3 to 0.3 °C and 23.2015%, respectively. We verified a series of measurements of NEE using the dynamic and static closed chamber methods. The results show a good common point between the two measurement methods (N = 10, R2 = 0.986; and mean difference: ΔCO2 = 0.079 μmol m−2s−1). This automated chamber was found to be useful for reducing the labor requirement and improving the time resolution of NEE monitoring. In the future, the relationship between the humidity control system and chamber volume can be studied to control the microclimate change more accurately.

[1]  L. Elsgaard,et al.  Net ecosystem exchange of CO2 and carbon balance for eight temperate organic soils under agricultural management , 2012 .

[2]  G. Inoue,et al.  A multichannel automated chamber system for continuous measurement of forest soil CO2 efflux. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[3]  Wenting Han,et al.  An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Gas Sampling System for Analyzing CO2 and Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Laboratory , 2020, Italian National Conference on Sensors.

[4]  R. Albrizio,et al.  Automated closed-system canopy-chamber for continuous field-crop monitoring of CO2 and H2O fluxes , 2002 .

[5]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Varying Vegetation Composition, Respiration and Photosynthesis Decrease Temporal Variability of the CO2 Sink in a Boreal Bog , 2019, Ecosystems.

[6]  Weijun Luo,et al.  Effects of afforestation on soil CH4 and N2O fluxes in a nsubtropical karst landscape. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  F. Villalobos,et al.  A large closed canopy chamber for measuring CO2 and water vapour exchange of whole trees , 2010 .

[8]  B. Glaser,et al.  Increased CO2 fluxes from a sandy Cambisol under agricultural use in the Wendland region, Northern Germany, three years after biochar substrates application , 2018 .

[9]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Closed-Chamber Effects on Leaf Temperature, Canopy Photosynthesis, and Evapotranspiration , 1992 .

[10]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  A spatially hierarchical integration of close-range remote sensing, leaf structure and physiology assists in diagnosing spatiotemporal dimensions of field-scale ecosystem photosynthetic productivity , 2017 .

[11]  M. Fan,et al.  Comparison of net ecosystem CO2 exchange in cropland and grassland with an automated closed chamber system , 2014, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[12]  H. Höper,et al.  Effects of land use intensity on the full greenhouse gas balance in an Atlantic peat bog , 2012 .

[13]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The effects of chamber pressurization on soil‐surface CO2 flux and the implications for NEE measurements under elevated CO2 , 1999 .

[14]  Fanlong Kong,et al.  CO2 exchange under different vegetation covers in a coastal wetland of Jiaozhou Bay, China , 2019, Ecological Engineering.

[15]  J. Norman,et al.  Measurements of canopy gas exchange using an open chamber system , 1990 .

[16]  Prediction of water removal rate in a natural gas dehydration system using radial basis function neural network , 2016 .

[17]  Andreas Heinemeyer,et al.  Comparing the closed static versus the closed dynamic chamber flux methodology: Implications for soil respiration studies , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[18]  P. Angelis,et al.  Canopy Chamber: a useful tool to monitor the CO2 exchange dynamics of shrubland , 2017 .

[19]  Assessing the impact of peat erosion on growing season CO2 fluxes by comparing erosional peat pans and surrounding vegetated haggs , 2019, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[20]  Jonghan Ko,et al.  Canopy scale CO 2 exchange and productivity of transplanted paddy and direct seeded rainfed rice production systems in S. Korea , 2016 .

[21]  E. Pendall,et al.  Elevated carbon dioxide alters impacts of precipitation pulses on ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration in a semi-arid grassland , 2010, Oecologia.

[22]  Xinquan Zhao,et al.  CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau as affected by N-addition and grazing exclusion , 2020, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[23]  T. Sauer,et al.  Portable canopy chamber measurements of evapotranspiration in corn, soybean and reconstructed prairie , 2018 .

[24]  Yiyon Wang,et al.  Emission of CO2, CH4 and N2O from freshwater marsh in northeast of China. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.