Social Influence in the Concurrent Diffusion of Information and Behaviors in Online Social Networks

The emergence of online social networks has greatly facilitated the diffusion of information and behaviors. While the two diffusion processes are often intertwined, "talking the talk" does not necessarily mean "walking the talk"--those who share information about an action may not actually participate in it. We do not know if the diffusion of information and behaviors are similar, or if social influence plays an equally important role in these processes. Integrating text mining, social network analyses, and survival analysis, this research examines the concurrent spread of information and behaviors related to the Ice Bucket Challenge on Twitter. We show that the two processes follow different patterns. Unilateral social influence contributes to the diffusion of information, but not to the diffusion of behaviors; bilateral influence conveyed via the communication process is a significant and positive predictor of the diffusion of behaviors, but not of information. These results have implications for theories of social influence, social networks, and contagion.

[1]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[2]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[3]  G. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1961 .

[4]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[5]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Tracking information epidemics in blogspace , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[6]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks , 2004, Nature.

[7]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .

[9]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[10]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[13]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Predicting Adoption Probabilities in Social Networks , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle , 2009, KDD.

[17]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content , 2009, EC '09.

[18]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[20]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[21]  H. Hethcote.  Three Basic Epidemiological Models , 1989 .

[22]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[23]  W. Kamakura,et al.  The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis , 1995 .

[24]  Vincent Y. Shen,et al.  User identification across multiple social networks , 2009, 2009 First International Conference on Networked Digital Technologies.

[25]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[26]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[27]  Sinan Aral,et al.  What Would Ashton Do--and Does It Matter? , 2013 .

[28]  D. Bem.  Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[29]  John Yen,et al.  Finding influential users of online health communities: a new metric based on sentiment influence. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[30]  Roger Th. A. J. Leenders,et al.  Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[31]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  The Author-Topic Model for Authors and Documents , 2004, UAI.

[32]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Chan S Suh,et al.  Online Activities, Spatial Proximity, and the Diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street Movement in the United States * , 2016 .

[34]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment on Peer Influence in Online Social Networks - Online E-Companion Appendix , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.