Pursuit Driver Training Improves Memory for Skill-Based Information

Police drivers must attend to information from multiple sensory modalities during a high-speed pursuit. This aises an important question: Does training facilitate the shifting of focus between visual and auditory modalities and the subsequent recall of information? The authors tested personnel from the London Metropolitan Police Service to see if various levels of driving training influenced memory recall during an attention-shifting task. Participants were presented standard and police-related memory items while simultaneously attending to distracters. Brain activity was measured to the presentation of the distracters to ensure participants are indeed paying attention to both tasks. The authors found that training did have a significant effect on memory for police-related items. The results are attributed to training because the experimental design ruled out concentration and natural ability as possible explanations.

[1]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  The temporal flexibility of attentional selection in the visual cortex , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[7]  G. Mangun,et al.  Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[9]  Charles Spence Crossmodal attention , 1998, Scholarpedia.

[10]  S. Yantis,et al.  Control of Attention Shifts between Vision and Audition in Human Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Smyth,et al.  Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[13]  C. Spence,et al.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  C. Basak,et al.  Ageing and Switching of the Focus of Attention in Working Memory: Results from a Modified N-Back Task , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[16]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.