Utilization of CDKN1A/p21 gene for class discrimination of DNA damage-induced clastogenicity.

The in vitro mammalian cytogenetic tests monitor chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells to test the mutagenicity of compounds. Although these tests are especially useful for evaluating the potential clastogenic effects of chemicals, false positives associated with excessive toxicity occur frequently. There is a growing demand for mechanism-based assays to confirm positive results from cytogenetic tests. We hypothesized that a toxicogenomic approach that is based on gene expression profiles could be used to investigate mechanisms of genotoxicity. Human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells were treated with each of eight different genotoxins that included six DNA damaging compounds-mitomycin C, methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, cisplatin, etoposide, hydroxyurea-and two compounds that do not damage DNA-colchicine and adenine. Cells were exposed to each compound for 4h, and Affymetrix U133A microarrays were then used to comprehensively examine gene expression. A statistical analysis was used to select biomarker candidates, and 103 probes met our statistical criteria. Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A)/p21 was ranked highest for discriminating DNA-damaging compounds. To further characterize the biological significance of alterations in gene expression, functional network analysis was performed with the 103 selected probes. Interestingly, a CDKN1A-centered interactome was identified as the most significant network. Together, these findings indicated that DNA-damaging compounds often induced changes in the expression of a large number of these 103 probes and that upregulation of CDKN1A was a common key feature of DNA damage stimuli. The utility of CDKN1A as a biomarker for assessing the genotoxicity of drug candidates was further evaluated; specifically, quantitative RT-PCR was used to assess the effects of 14 additional compounds-including DNA damaging genotoxins and genotoxins that do not damage DNA and five newly-synthesized drug candidates-on CDKN1A expression. In these assays, DNA damage-positive clastogens were clearly separated from DNA damage-negative compounds based on CDKN1A expression. In conclusion, CDKN1A may be a valuable biomarker for identifying DNA damage-inducing clastogens and as a follow-up assay for mammalian cytogenetic tests.

[1]  Min Zhang,et al.  A decade of toxicogenomic research and its contribution to toxicological science. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  C. Mathews,et al.  Differential Effects of Hydroxyurea upon Deoxyribonucleoside Triphosphate Pools, Analyzed with Vaccinia Virus Ribonucleotide Reductase* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Tilman Schneider-Poetsch,et al.  Inhibition of Eukaryotic Translation Elongation by Cycloheximide and Lactimidomycin , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[4]  A. Sarasin,et al.  Characterization of DNA reactive and non-DNA reactive anticancer drugs by gene expression profiling. , 2007, Mutation research.

[5]  J. Trent,et al.  WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression , 1993, Cell.

[6]  J. Tischfield,et al.  Replication Stress Induces Micronuclei Comprising of Aggregated DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Chung-Cheng Liu,et al.  Type II DNA topoisomerases: Enzymes that can unknot a topologically knotted DNA molecule via a reversible double-strand break , 1980, Cell.

[8]  J. Sludden,et al.  Autoregulation of 5-fluorouracil metabolism. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[9]  K. Kohn Interstrand cross-linking of DNA by 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and other 1-(2-haloethyl)-1-nitrosoureas. , 1977, Cancer research.

[10]  Hung-Ying Kao,et al.  Ataxin 1, a SCA1 neurodegenerative disorder protein, is functionally linked to the silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Homologous recombination protects mammalian cells from replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks arising in response to methyl methanesulfonate. , 2010, DNA repair.

[12]  H. Yamada,et al.  Toxicogenomic biomarkers for renal papillary injury in rats. , 2013, Toxicology.

[13]  M. Crescenzi,et al.  The accumulation of MMS-induced single strand breaks in G1 phase is recombinogenic in DNA polymerase β defective mammalian cells , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  P. Olive,et al.  Detection of DNA double-strand breaks through the cell cycle after exposure to X-rays, bleomycin, etoposide and 125IdUrd. , 1993, International journal of radiation biology.

[15]  P. Schiff,et al.  Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol , 1979, Nature.

[16]  T. Hunter,et al.  Cyclin-dependent Kinases Are Inactivated by a Combination of p21 and Thr-14/Tyr-15 Phosphorylation after UV-induced DNA Damage* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  J. Hoeijmakers,et al.  Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  S. Friedman,et al.  Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibition by the KLF6 Tumor Suppressor Protein through Interaction with Cyclin D1 , 2004, Cancer Research.

[19]  H. Yamada,et al.  Identification of genomic biomarkers for concurrent diagnosis of drug-induced renal tubular injury using a large-scale toxicogenomics database. , 2009, Toxicology.

[20]  Shibing Deng,et al.  Characterization and interlaboratory comparison of a gene expression signature for differentiating genotoxic mechanisms. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[21]  R J Owellen,et al.  Inhibition of tubulin-microtubule polymerization by drugs of the Vinca alkaloid class. , 1976, Cancer research.

[22]  W. Szybalski,et al.  A MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF MITOMYCIN ACTION: LINKING OF COMPLEMENTARY DNA STRANDS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. O’Neill,et al.  Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of alkylating agents in cultured mammalian cells (CHO/HGPRT system): mutagen treatment in the presence or absence of serum. , 1979, Mutation research.

[24]  T. Todo,et al.  Mitotic slippage underlies the relationship between p53 dysfunction and the induction of large micronuclei by colcemid. , 2013, Mutagenesis.

[25]  J. Ashby,et al.  Clastogenicity in vitro of the Na, K, Ca and Mg salts of saccharin; and of magnesium chloride; consideration of significance. , 1986, Mutation research.

[26]  Ivan Rusyn,et al.  Predicting drug-induced hepatotoxicity using QSAR and toxicogenomics approaches. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[27]  H. Yamada,et al.  Prediction model of potential hepatocarcinogenicity of rat hepatocarcinogens using a large-scale toxicogenomics database. , 2011, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[28]  H. Liber,et al.  Mutation assay at the thymidine kinase locus in diploid human lymphoblasts. , 1982, Mutation research.

[29]  T. Uehara,et al.  Genomic biomarkers for cardiotoxicity in rats as a sensitive tool in preclinical studies , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[30]  Michael L Bittner,et al.  Stress-specific signatures: expression profiling of p53 wild-type and -null human cells , 2005, Oncogene.

[31]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Toxicogenomics applied to in vitro carcinogenicity testing with Balb/c 3T3 cells revealed a gene signature predictive of chemical carcinogens. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[32]  T. Sofuni,et al.  A comparative study of TK6 human lymphoblastoid and L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell lines in the in vitro micronucleus test. , 1996, Mutation research.

[33]  E. Vazquez,et al.  p21 modulates threshold of apoptosis induced by DNA-damage and growth factor withdrawal in prostate cancer cells. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[34]  D. Kirkland,et al.  Interpretation of the biological relevance of genotoxicity test results: the importance of thresholds. , 2000, Mutation research.

[35]  David Brusick,et al.  Genotoxicity under extreme culture conditions , 1991 .

[36]  K. Kohn,et al.  Repair of and checkpoint response to topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. , 2003, Mutation research.

[37]  Stefan Hümmer,et al.  Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex , 2009, Current Biology.

[38]  S. Friedman,et al.  Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibition by the KLF 6 Tumor Suppressor Protein through Interaction with Cyclin D 1 , 2004 .

[39]  N. Kiyosawa,et al.  A toxicogenomics approach for early assessment of potential non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals in rats. , 2008, Toxicology.

[40]  T. Ludwig,et al.  BRCA1 functions independently of homologous recombination in DNA interstrand crosslink repair. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[41]  Hiroshi Yamada,et al.  Toxicogenomic multigene biomarker for predicting the future onset of proximal tubular injury in rats. , 2012, Toxicology.

[42]  J. Battershill Toxicogenomics: regulatory perspective on current position , 2005, Human & experimental toxicology.

[43]  T. Uehara,et al.  Identification of potential genomic biomarkers for early detection of chemically induced cardiotoxicity in rats. , 2010, Toxicology.

[44]  K. Kohn,et al.  Mechanism of action of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II). , 1979, Cancer treatment reports.

[45]  S. Elledge,et al.  The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases , 1993, Cell.

[46]  A. Gartel,et al.  Activation and repression of p21WAF1/CIP1 transcription by RB binding proteins , 1998, Oncogene.

[47]  Gordon Vansant,et al.  Gene expression profiling of rat livers reveals indicators of potential adverse effects. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.