Passenger experience with quality-enhanced bus service: the tyne and wear ‘superoute’ services

This paper investigates the role that enhanced service quality introduced into a deregulated market has in improving the experience of bus travel by a sample of passengers in the Tyne and Wear area of England. A generalised ordered choice (GOC) model that accounts for preference heterogeneity through random parameters, as well as heteroscedasticity in unobserved variance, and random parameterisation of thresholds, is implemented to identify sources of influence on the overall experience of bus travel in the presence and absence of the quality-enhanced treatment of service. The GOC model is contrasted with a standard ordered logit model, and the marginal effects associated with the preferred GOC model are derived for each influencing attribute, taking into account the various ways in which each influence contributes to the utility associated with each level of bus experience. The paper supports a view that the introduction of quality improvements, via a Quality Bus Partnership, does contribute non-marginally to an increase in a positive bus experience, and signals a way forward through cooperative intervention, to grow patronage. Knowing which attributes successfully deliver a more positive experience (and those that do not) means that resources are effectively targeted at the aspect of service provision which will increase patronage and therefore revenues, satisfying the objectives of both the bus operator and the local authority partner.

[1]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations , 1990 .

[2]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[3]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: a six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes. , 2007 .

[4]  D. Hensher,et al.  A Service Quality Index for Area-wide Contract Performance Assessment , 2002 .

[5]  D. Hensher,et al.  A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  J. Preston,et al.  The demand for public transport: a practical guide , 2004 .

[7]  M. Kuby,et al.  Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States , 2004 .

[8]  C. Bhat,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TWO ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORAL CHOICE MECHANISMS FOR HOUSEHOLD AUTO OWNERSHIP DECISIONS , 1998 .

[9]  David J Edwards,et al.  BUS TRAVEL TRENDS IN THE U.K.. , 1996 .

[10]  Lesley Chiou,et al.  Masking Identification of Discrete Choice Models Under Simulation Methods , 2007 .

[11]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[12]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Service quality––developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts , 2003 .

[13]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments , 2008 .

[14]  S. Rosenbloom,et al.  THE PUZZLE OF INCOME, RACE, AND DENSITY: PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE ON TRANSIT USE FROM THE 1991 AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .