Differential impact of response effort within a response chain on use of mands in a student with autism.

We investigated the effects of response effort on the use of mands during functional communication training (FCT) in a participant with autism. The number of links in a picture exchange response chain determined two levels of response effort. Each level was paired with a fixed ratio (FR3) schedule of reinforcement for aggression in a reversal design. Responding to either schedule produced access to a preferred item. The participant opted for the low effort mand while aggression decreased significantly. However, the high effort mand did not compete with the FR3 schedule for aggression. Results are discussed in terms of response effort within a response chain of a picture exchange system and competing ratio schedules for problem behavior during mand training.

[1]  R. Horner,et al.  The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  The Role of Response Efficiency in the Reduction of Problem Behaviors through Functional Equivalence Training: A Case Study , 1990 .

[3]  S. Kahng,et al.  Does functional communication training compete with ongoing contingencies of reinforcement? An analysis during response acquisition and maintenance. , 1997, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[4]  B. Iwata,et al.  TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY , 1994 .

[5]  W. Fisher,et al.  Behavioral economic influences on treatments designed to decrease destructive behavior. , 2001, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  M. E. Kelley,et al.  The effects of competing reinforcement schedules on the acquisition of functional communication. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  D. Wacker,et al.  Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation. , 2001, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  T. Reimers,et al.  A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  W. Fisher,et al.  Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: a summary of 21 inpatient cases. , 1998, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  E. Carr,et al.  An analysis of maintenance following functional communication training. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  W. Fisher,et al.  Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior. , 2000, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  E. Carr,et al.  Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: maintenance and application in new settings. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  S. Kahng,et al.  Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training. , 2000, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  P. Schloss,et al.  Reducing Disruptive Behaviors by Training Students to Request Assistance , 1994, Behavior modification.

[15]  L. LeBlanc,et al.  Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  S. Kahng,et al.  Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training. , 1997, Journal of applied behavior analysis.