Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities

We theoretically and empirically investigate the relationship between information technology (IT) and firm innovation. Invoking absorptive capacity (ACAP) theory, we introduce and develop the concepts of three types of IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Firm innovation is examined through two observable innovation outcomes: patents, and new product and service introductions. These innovation outcomes are often labeled as competitive actions aggressively undertaken by firms to gain market share or to achieve profitability. We use secondary data about IT-enabled knowledge capabilities and innovation outcomes of 110 firms. Our data results provide strong support for our main assertion that knowledge capabilities that are enhanced through the use of IT contribute to firm innovation. The study's findings suggest that the three types of IT-enabled knowledge capabilities have differential effects on firm innovation. This study substantially contributes to the information systems (IS) research, methodology, and practice in multiple ways.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Evolution of Intracorporate Domains: Divisional Charter Losses in High-Technology, Multidivisional Corporations , 1996 .

[4]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[5]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[6]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements , 1997 .

[7]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[8]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences: Research Articles , 2004 .

[9]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Special Issue on Information Technology and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[10]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[11]  Robert A. Burgelman,et al.  Strategic Dissonance , 1996 .

[12]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[13]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[14]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[15]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[16]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Competitive Dynamics Of Interfirm Rivalry , 1996 .

[17]  G. Sileshi,et al.  Selecting the right statistical model for analysis of insect count data by using information theoretic measures , 2006, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[18]  Marco F. Ramoni,et al.  Clinical forecasting in drug development , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[20]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[21]  S. Nambisan,et al.  A buyer's guide to the innovation bazaar. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[22]  D. Barton.  Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation , 1995 .

[23]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Digital Systems, Partnership Networks, and Competition: The Co-Evolution of IOS Use and Network Position as Antecedents of Competitive Action , 2008, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[24]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[25]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[27]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Knowledge Management Using Information Technology: Determinants of Short-Term Impact on Firm Value , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[28]  H. Akaike.  Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models , 1973 .

[29]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[30]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[31]  F. Lichtenberg.  The Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm- Level Analysis , 1993 .

[32]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[33]  J. P. Andrew,et al.  Innovating for cash. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[34]  Guy L. F. Holburn,et al.  Contentious Implementation and Retrenchment in Neoliberal Policy Reform: The Global Electric Power Industry, 1989–2001 , 2009 .

[35]  G. Tellis,et al.  Will It Ever Fly? Modeling the Takeoff of Really New Consumer Durables , 1997 .

[36]  W. Luppold,et al.  The Determinants of , 1985 .

[37]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION , 2011 .

[38]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[39]  Richard Luecke,et al.  Managing creativity and innovation , 2003 .

[40]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning , 2007 .

[41]  T. M. Nevens,et al.  Commercializing technology: What the best companies do , 1990 .

[42]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[43]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[44]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[45]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[46]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[47]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[48]  J. Shaver.  Testing for Mediating Variables in Management Research: Concerns, Implications, and Alternative Strategies , 2005 .

[49]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Data Warehousing: The 3M Experience , 2004 .

[50]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[51]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[52]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[53]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[55]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[56]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[57]  S. Shane,et al.  Determinants of invention commercialization: an empirical examination of academically sourced inventions , 2007 .

[58]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The innovation value chain. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[59]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[60]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[61]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  The knowledge chain model: activities for competitiveness , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[62]  L. Kim.  The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors , 1997 .

[63]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004 .

[64]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Rajesh Chandy,et al.  Competitive Response to Radical Product Innovations , 2008 .

[66]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  Diamonds in the Data Mine , 2003 .

[67]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Data Warehousing Supports Corporate Strategy At First American Corporation , 2000, MIS Q..

[68]  Walter J. Ferrier.  Navigating the Competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of Competitive Aggressiveness , 2001 .

[69]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Framework for managing business development in the networked organisation , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[70]  H. Acquah.  Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of an asymmetric price relationship , 2010 .

[71]  T. Davenport.  Competing on analytics. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[72]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  FIRM VALUE ? : A STUDY OF FIRMS PURSUING DIFFERENT BUSINESS STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[73]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[74]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[75]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The recency of technological inputs and financial performance , 2008 .

[76]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[77]  A. Koestler.  The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[78]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[79]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[80]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[81]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[82]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[83]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  TOP MANAGEMENT, STRATEGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES , 1992 .

[84]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[85]  D. JoshiK.,et al.  Changing the Competitive Landscape , 2010 .

[86]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation , 2007, CACM.

[87]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Competitive Dynamics in Electronic Networks: A Model and the Case of Interorganizational Systems , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[88]  Rajesh K. Chandy,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development , 2006 .

[89]  Elizabeth Webster,et al.  Achieving the Optimal Power of Patent Rights , 2004 .

[90]  Judy E. Scott.  Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[91]  N. Carr.  IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[92]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[93]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[94]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[95]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[96]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[97]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS RESEARCH: CRITIQUE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2002 .

[98]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Who Does R&D and Who Patents? , 1982 .

[99]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[100]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[101]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[102]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[103]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .