Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to characterise peach cultivars and to monitor their ripening stage during shelf-life

A commercial electronic nose (PEN 2, Win Muster Airsense) was used to classify four peach cultivars and to assess the ripening stage during shelf-life. Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to investigate whether the electronic nose was able to distinguish among four diverse cultivars. PCA applied on the electronic nose data, collected during shelf-life from harvest until senescence, highlighted the ability of the instrument to assess the ripening stage of peaches. The loading analysis identified one sensor as the only relevant one in the discrimination of peaches on the basis of their shelf-life. The responses of the sensor were plotted against time and fitted with a sigmoid transition function allowing the definition of three different ripening stages (unripe, ripe, over-ripe) based on the trend of first and second time derivatives. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was applied to characterise peach samples into the three classes. The performance of the electronic nose was compared with the results of classical and non-destructive techniques such as ethylene measurement and colour evaluation, frequently used to assess the ripening stage of climacteric fruit.

[1]  Eduard Llobet,et al.  Non-destructive banana ripeness determination using a neural network-based electronic nose , 1999 .

[2]  C. Natale,et al.  An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life , 2004 .

[3]  E. Schaller,et al.  ‘Electronic Noses’ and Their Application to Food , 1998 .

[4]  Jun Wang,et al.  Pear dynamic characteristics and firmness detection , 2004 .

[5]  Eduard Llobet,et al.  Fruit ripeness monitoring using an Electronic Nose , 2000 .

[6]  Randall D. Tobias,et al.  Chemometrics: A Practical Guide , 1998, Technometrics.

[7]  M. J. Delwiche,et al.  Ground Color as a Peach Maturity Index , 1985, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[8]  A. Schiraldi,et al.  Isothermal calorimetry approach to evaluate shelf life of foods , 2001 .

[9]  William R. Okie,et al.  Comparison of quality characteristics of selected yellow-and white-fleshed peach cultivars , 1990 .

[10]  Jun Wang,et al.  Electronic nose technique potential monitoring mandarin maturity , 2006 .

[11]  J. Gardner,et al.  Electronic noses and their application in the food industry , 1997 .

[12]  E. Martinelli,et al.  Electronic nose based investigation of the sensorial properties of peaches and nectarines , 2001 .

[13]  M. Forina,et al.  Chemometrics for analytical chemistry , 1992 .

[14]  J. Brezmes,et al.  Correlation between electronic nose signals and fruit quality indicators on shelf-life measurements with pinklady apples , 2001 .

[15]  M. Noferini,et al.  NON-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUE TO ASSESS INTERNAL FRUIT QUALITY , 2003 .

[16]  R. Paolesse,et al.  Outer product analysis of electronic nose and visible spectra: application to the measurement of peach fruit characteristics , 2002 .

[17]  C. Natale,et al.  Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples , 2003 .

[18]  A. H. Gómez,et al.  Evaluation of tomato maturity by electronic nose , 2006 .

[19]  C. Natale,et al.  Electronic nose systems to study shelf life and cultivar effect on tomato aroma profile , 2004 .