Landscape justice: creating stakeholders’ rights and responsibilities in utilizing and managing conservation forests in jeneberang watershed upstream

The government has organized state forest areas to be managed with specific management objectives, so that forest ecosystem services can be produced sustainably. On the other hand, this arrangement limits the access of local communities whose livelihoods depend on the forest. The dynamics of land use change in conservation forest areas due to pressure from local communities and non-forestry sectors have, over the past ten years, led to environmental problems such as: forest degradation, water crisis, floods and droughts, and erosion. This paper examines the concept of sovereignty and the concept of forest tenure as principles of creating rights and responsibilities in relation to sustainable and equitable forest utilization and management. This is particularly important in the context of developing forest governance based on landscape justice. This paper recommends the reconstruction of forest landuse, from a fractional basis to a landscape-based watershed area.

[1]  Q. Ma,et al.  Distributional environmental justice of residential walking space: The lens of urban ecosystem services supply and demand. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Milena Kiatkoski Kim,et al.  Equity in environmental governance: perceived fairness of distributional justice principles in marine co-management , 2021 .

[3]  R. Maguire Global Forest Governance: Legal Concepts and Policy Trends , 2013 .

[4]  E. Lambin,et al.  Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice , 2010 .

[6]  J. Ribot,et al.  A Theory of Access. , 2009 .

[7]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Forests, Governance, and Sustainability: Common Property Theory and its Contributions , 2007 .

[8]  J. Ribot,et al.  The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field , 2007 .

[9]  J. Lovett,et al.  Institutions and collective action: Does heterogeneity matter in community-based resource management? , 2006 .

[10]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[11]  Frances Cleaver,et al.  Moral Ecological Rationality, Institutions and the Management of Common Property Resources , 2000 .

[12]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation , 1999 .

[13]  M. Leach,et al.  Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community-Based Natural Resource Management , 1999 .

[14]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[15]  M. Ekayani,et al.  Agroforestry management systems through landscape-life scape integration: A case study in Gowa, Indonesia , 2022 .

[16]  Seung Kyum Kim,et al.  Socioeconomic groups and their green spaces availability in urban areas of China: A distributional justice perspective , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[17]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Legal Pluralism and Dynamic Property Rights , 2002 .