Price Determination of Electricity Supply in Thailand Based on Externalities, Wheeling Charges, and Losses

In Thailand, the electricity rates imposed on end users do not adequately reflect generation technology, externalities suffered by localities, and the transmission of electricity across distances. Thus, this study proposes a new method to determine the price of electricity supply which differentiates among end users in Thailand by area or zone, thus offering choices in matching import with demand and establishing fairness for those affected by the undesirable effects of power generation. The cost of electricity incurred in each zone is calculated based on whether a given zone has the potential to be an exporter or importer of electric energy, which is evaluated on an annual average basis and is a combination of technology-specific, levelized cost of electricity ( LCOE) -based generation cost and external cost. In addition, electricity importers must incur wheeling charges and losses when importing to match their deficits. Calculation results show significant reductions in electricity rate imposed on the exporter zones as a compensation of externalities suffered and delivering their excess to help those in deficit through the proposed price and export–import scheme. Policy recommendations from the study are intended to alleviate conflicts of interest of all stakeholders within the country’ s power sector, to encourage public participation and local authorities’ involvement in the planning of power generation facilities, which will also comply with the latest Constitutions and provide suggestions for the Power Development Plan.

[1]  M. Manera,et al.  Modeling Electricity Prices: From the State of the Art to a Draft of a New Proposal , 2008 .

[2]  Alexandru Maxim Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis , 2014 .

[3]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: Analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model , 2007 .

[4]  D. Istance Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1966, Nature.

[5]  Ian F. Roth,et al.  Incorporating externalities into a full cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing , 2004 .

[6]  Cristopher Ballinas Valdés The Energy Regulatory Commission , 2011 .

[7]  Joel N. Swisher,et al.  Tools and Methods for Integrated Resource Planning: Improving Energy Efficiency and Protecting the Environment , 1996 .

[8]  C. Chompunth Public Participation In Planning The Coal-firedPower Plant Projects In Thailand , 2012 .

[9]  S. Sitch,et al.  Biomass burning related ozone damage on vegetation over the Amazon forest: a model sensitivity study , 2015 .

[10]  D. Berry,et al.  Electricity generation costs , 1954 .

[11]  N. Laosiripojana,et al.  Incentives for Renewable Energy in Southeast Asia: Case study of , 2013 .

[12]  W. Short,et al.  A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies , 1995 .

[13]  Dalia Streimikiene,et al.  External costs of electricity generation options in Lithuania , 2014 .

[14]  Samuel Grausz The Social Cost of Coal: Implications for the World Bank , 2011 .

[15]  Zhiwei Xu,et al.  Monetization of External Costs Using Lifecycle Analysis—A Comparative Case Study of Coal-Fired and Biomass Power Plants in Northeast China , 2015 .

[16]  M. Weitzman ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS , 2010 .

[17]  T. Sundqvist,et al.  Valuing the environmental impacts of electricity generation : a critical survey , 2002 .

[18]  Kuskana Kubaha,et al.  External costs of fossil electricity generation: Health-based assessment in Thailand , 2011 .

[19]  P. Lazarczyk,et al.  Comparison of congestion management techniques: Nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing , 2015 .