Revenue-maximizing and truthful online auctions for dynamic spectrum access

Secondary spectrum auctions have been suggested as a strategically robust mechanism for distributing idle spectrum to competing secondary users. However, previous work on such auction design have assumed a static auction setting, thus failing to fully exploit the inherently time-varying nature of spectrum demand and utilization. In this paper, we address this issue from the perspective of the primary user who wishes to maximize the auction revenue. We present an online auction framework that dynamically accepts bids and allocates spectrum. We prove rigorously that our online auction framework is truthful in the multiple dimensions of bid values, as well as bid timing parameters. To protect against unbounded loss of revenue due to latter bids, we introduce controlled preemption into our mechanism. We prove that preemption, coupled with the technique of inflating bids artificially, leads to an online auction that guarantees a 1/5-fraction of the optimal revenue as obtained by an offline adversary. Since the previous guarantee holds only for the optimal channel allocation, we further provide a greedy channel allocation scheme which provides scalability. We prove that the greedy scheme also obtains a constant competitive revenue guarantee, where the constant depends on the parameter of the conflict graph.

[1]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[2]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Algorithmic mechanism design (extended abstract) , 1999, STOC '99.

[3]  William Samuelson Auctions in Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[4]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Online auctions with re-usable goods , 2005, EC '05.

[5]  Zongpeng Li,et al.  Strategyproof auctions for balancing social welfare and fairness in secondary spectrum markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  Klaus Jansen,et al.  Polynomial-time approximation schemes for geometric graphs , 2001, SODA '01.

[7]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[8]  Zongpeng Li,et al.  A prior-free revenue maximizing auction for secondary spectrum access , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Adaptive limited-supply online auctions , 2004, EC '04.

[11]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[12]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  To preempt or not: Tackling bid and time-based cheating in online spectrum auctions , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  SALSA: Strategyproof Online Spectrum Admissions for Wireless Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[14]  Johann Hurink,et al.  A Robust PTAS for Maximum Weight Independent Sets in Unit Disk Graphs , 2004, WG.

[15]  Dan McCloskey,et al.  Chicago spectrum occupancy measurements & analysis and a long-term studies proposal , 2006, TAPAS '06.

[16]  Allan Borodin,et al.  Online computation and competitive analysis , 1998 .

[17]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Revenue generation for truthful spectrum auction in dynamic spectrum access , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[18]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[19]  Spectrum Auctions Spectrum Auctions , 2010 .

[20]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms , 2000, EC '00.

[21]  Xia Zhou,et al.  eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions , 2008, MobiCom '08.