A model for decision support in business-driven IT service portfolio management using SLA-dependent criteria and under uncertainty

This paper presents a model to support decision making for investments in IT services. As such it contributes to IT service portfolio management. Investment options are analyzed and ranked according to a utility index estimated from possible positive and negative business impact of IT services due to IT Service Level Agreement (SLA) compliance and violations. The Balanced Scorecard framework is used to infer the linkage between IT and business activities. The approach takes uncertainty into account by means of utility theory and interval arithmetic. Numerical illustrations encompassing tangible SLA-dependent criteria demonstrate how the approach may be of use.

[1]  R. Stewart,et al.  IT/IS projects selection using multi‐criteria utility theory , 2002 .

[2]  D. Trastour,et al.  IT service management driven by business objectives An application to incident management , 2006, 2006 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium NOMS 2006.

[3]  Jeanette Nasem Morgan.  A Roadmap of Financial Measures for IT Project ROI , 2005, IT Prof..

[4]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  Managing risks in IT projects: an options perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[5]  K. Feldman.  Portfolio Selection, Efficient Diversification of Investments . By Harry M. Markowitz (Basil Blackwell, 1991) £25.00 , 1992 .

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[7]  Jacques Philippe Sauvé,et al.  A quantitative approach to IT investment allocation to improve business results , 2006, Seventh IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'06).

[8]  Peter E. D. Love,et al.  Management of risks in information technology projects , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[9]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Modelling project investment decisions under uncertainty using possibility theory , 2001 .

[10]  Claudio Bartolini,et al.  Value-based IT decision support: Towards a formal business value model for steering IT-business alignment , 2009, 2009 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management-Workshops.

[11]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  L. Zadeh.  Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[14]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[15]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. , 1960 .

[16]  Narasimhaiah Gorla,et al.  Information system project selection using fuzzy logic , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[17]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[18]  H. Markowitz.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1971 .

[19]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[20]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Contractor selection using multi criteria utility theory: an additive mode , 1998 .

[21]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Chapter 1 – Information technology and systems justification , 2008 .

[22]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A comprehensive model for selecting information system project under fuzzy environment , 2009 .

[24]  Marek W. Gutowski.  Power and beauty of interval methods , 2003, ArXiv.