UNDERSTANDING OF FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS RESULTS UNDER THE FRAMEWORK OF OXLEY'S MACHINING MODEL

ABSTRACT We introduce an accurate coupled thermo-mechanical finite element analysis (FEA) of machining using the Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) analysis capability of ABAQUS/Explicit. This analysis provides detailed information about the cutting forces, chip thickness, contact length, the extent of the primary and secondary shear zones as well as the distribution of strain, strain rate and temperature in the deformation zones. This information has to be viewed under the framework of an analytical model for it to lead to better understanding of the physics of machining. We use the best available analytical model, namely, Oxley's machining model, for this purpose and the FEA results are compared with the assumptions and predictions of Oxley's analysis. The strain rate in the primary shear zone, the hydrostatic pressure variation along the shear plane, the distribution of normal and shear stresses along the tool-chip interface and the shape of the secondary shear zone are the quantities compared. Due to the key role of temperature in the prediction of tool wear, the fraction of heat conducted away into the workpiece, the maximum temperature along the tool-chip interface and the maximum temperature along the flank face are also compared. The comparison reveals that Oxley's model captures the physics of machining quite well. However, some details such as the heat partition module and the assumptions on stress and temperature distribution at the tool-chip interface need to be revisited.

[1]  Srinivasan Chandrasekar,et al.  Machining as a Wedge Indentation , 2000 .

[2]  Jean-Loup Chenot,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF CONTINUOUS CHIP FORMATION DURING NON‐STEADY ORTHOGONAL CUTTING , 1993 .

[3]  P. Oxley,et al.  Mechanics of Orthogonal Machining: Allowing for the Effects of Strain Rate and Temperature on Tool-Chip Friction , 1968 .

[4]  G. Boothroyd Temperatures in Orthogonal Metal Cutting , 1963 .

[5]  Robert W. Ivester,et al.  Assessment of Machining Models: Progress Report | NIST , 2000 .

[6]  Thomas Childs,et al.  Metal Machining: Theory and Applications , 2000 .

[7]  M. C. Shaw,et al.  Mechanics of Machining: An Analytical Approach to Assessing Machinability , 1989 .

[8]  A. H. Adibi-Sedeh,et al.  EFFECT OF SOME MODIFICATIONS TO OXLEY'S MACHINING THEORY AND THE APPLICABILITY OF DIFFERENT MATERIAL MODELS , 2002 .

[9]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Modelling and simulation of high-speed machining , 1995 .

[10]  Spfc Serge Jaspers Metal cutting mechanics and material behaviour , 1999 .

[11]  P. Oxley,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Speed and Scale on the Strain-Rate in a Zone of Intense Plastic Deformation , 1969 .

[12]  O. W. Dillon,et al.  Thermo-Viscoplastic Modeling of Machining Process Using a Mixed Finite Element Method , 1996 .

[13]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Metal Cutting With Chamfered and Blunt Tools , 2002 .

[14]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  Application of 2D FEM to chip formation in orthogonal cutting , 1996 .

[15]  A H. Adibi-Sedeh,et al.  Extension of Oxley’s Analysis of Machining to Use Different Material Models , 2003 .

[16]  G. Boothroyd,et al.  EFFECT OF TOOL FLANK WEAR ON THE TEMPERATURES GENERATED DURING METAL CUTTING , 1968 .

[17]  G. Barrow,et al.  On the Stress Distribution Between the Chip and Tool During Metal Turning , 1989 .

[18]  Olivier Dalverny,et al.  2D AND 3D NUMERICAL MODELS OF METAL CUTTING WITH DAMAGE EFFECTS. , 2004 .

[19]  John S. Strenkowski,et al.  Finite element models of orthogonal cutting with application to single point diamond turning , 1988 .

[20]  Robert W. Ivester,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF MACHINING MODELS: PROGRESS REPORT , 2000 .

[21]  W. F. Hastings,et al.  Predicting the strain rate in the zone of intense shear in which the chip is formed in machining from the dynamic flow stress properties of the work material and the cutting conditions , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.