The Influence of the Teaching and Learning Environment on the Development of Generic Capabilities Needed for a Knowledge-Based Society

The effect of the teaching and learning environment on the development of generic capabilities was examined through a survey of 1756 undergraduate students at a university in Hong Kong. The survey assessed students' perceptions of the development of the six capabilities of critical thinking, self-managed learning, adaptability, problem solving, communication skills, and interpersonal skills and groupwork. Students were also asked to rate the quality of nine facets of the teaching and learning environment. Structural equation modelling was used to test a model of the influence of teaching on the nurturing of the six capabilities. The model grouped the nine facets of teaching and learning under the three higher-order latent variables of teaching, teacher–student relationship, and student–student relationship. The model showed a good fit to the data, indicating that the teaching and learning environment had a significant impact on the development of the generic capabilities while the students were taking their degree. The teaching latent variable had the strongest effect on the development of all six of the capabilities. A suitable teaching environment was characterised by a focus on understanding, the active participation of students in learning activities, a coherent curriculum, and assessment which focused on analytical skills and self-learning capability. Strong student–student relationships nurtured communication and interpersonal skills. There was a mutually reinforcing effect between the type of teaching, teacher–student relationships and student–student relationships.

[1]  Philip C. Candy,et al.  Lifelong Learning: An Enduring Mandate for Higher Education , 1991 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[4]  B. Byrne.  Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[5]  David Kember,et al.  Influence of the Curriculum and Learning Environment on Group Learning Approaches Outside the Classroom , 2003 .

[6]  D. Kember,et al.  Avoider and Engager Approaches by Out-of-Class Groups: The Group Equivalent to Individual Learning Approaches. , 2004 .

[7]  Norman Jackson,et al.  Programme specification and its role in promoting an outcomes model of learning , 2000 .

[8]  Michael Miller.  Coefficient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling , 1995 .

[9]  Alex Radloff,et al.  Quality and Generic (Professional) Skills , 2000 .

[10]  Patrick E. Shrout,et al.  Reliability of Scales With General Structure: Point and Interval Estimation Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 2002 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[12]  John Medlin,et al.  Using diverse professional teams and a graduate qualities framework to develop generic skills within a commerce degree , 2003 .

[13]  H. Tait,et al.  Defining and Assessing Competence in Generic Skills , 1999 .

[14]  Madeleine Atkins,et al.  Effective Teaching in Higher Education , 1989 .

[15]  N. Purdie,et al.  Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  George R. Franke,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows , 1995 .

[17]  D. Kember,et al.  Engager and avoider behaviour in types of activities performed by out-of-class learning groups , 2004 .

[18]  A. Shapiro.  Weighted minimum trace factor analysis , 1982 .

[19]  David Jaques,et al.  Learning in Groups , 1984 .

[20]  Janet Leckey,et al.  Right Tracks—Wrong Rails: The Development of Generic Skills in Higher Education , 1997 .

[21]  T Raykov,et al.  Scale Reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and Violations of Essential Tau-Equivalence with Fixed Congeneric Components. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[22]  N. Schmitt.  Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. , 1996 .

[23]  David Kember,et al.  The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities , 2005 .

[24]  P. Bentler.  MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS WITH LATENT VARIABLES: CAUSAL MODELING , 1980 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[26]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[27]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Exploring the practice and development of generic skills through Web-based learning , 2001 .

[28]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[29]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[30]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  Coefficient Alpha and Composite Reliability With Interrelated Nonhomogeneous Items , 1998 .

[31]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[32]  David Kember,et al.  The influence of the part time study experience on the development of generic capabilities , 2005 .

[33]  P. Bentler,et al.  A quasi-newton method for minimum trace factor analysis , 1998 .

[34]  William T. Daly.  Teaching and Scholarship: Adapting American Higher Education to Hard Times. , 1994 .