A product semantic study of the influence of the sense of vision on the evalutation of wood

Based on product semantics, this study investigated how visual attributes of wood are perceived and interpreted semantically. The wood species alder, ash, aspen, birch, beech, elm, lime, larch, maple, oak, pine and spruce were used. The subjects rated the samples based on the descriptive words natural, exclusive, environmental (i.e., ecofriendly), rough, inexpensive, dark, reliable, warm, modern, cosy, solid, and light. The most significant differences were between softwoods and hardwoods. Principal component analysis yielded three dimensions based on visual perceptions: exclusive/modern, environmental/natural and light vs. dark. Maple and ash, in addition to other hardwoods, were seen as more exclusive/modern than spruce and pine. Pine, on the other hand, was perceived as the most environmental/ natural wood type. Beech and alder did not score high on any of the three dimensions. The potential use of these results in product design and interior design is discussed.

[1]  Scott A. Bowe,et al.  Species selection in secondary wood products: Implications for product design and promotion , 2002 .

[2]  T. J. Pakarinen,et al.  Consumer segments for wooden household furniture , 2001, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[3]  David L. Nicholls,et al.  Lumber attributes, characteristics, and species preferences as indicated by secondary wood products firms in the continental United States , 2006, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[4]  Oya Demirbilek,et al.  Product design, semantics and emotional response , 2003, Ergonomics.

[5]  Anders Roos,et al.  Product attributes affecting consumer preference for residential deck materials , 2008 .

[6]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[7]  Matthew Bumgardner,et al.  Understanding perception of wood household furniture: application of a policy capturing approach , 2007 .

[8]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance , 2005 .

[9]  Álvaro Page,et al.  Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment , 2007 .

[10]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That "Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)" , 1989 .

[11]  Reinhold Decker,et al.  Measuring the impact of wood species on consumer preferences for wooden furniture by means of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007 .

[12]  Olof Broman,et al.  Means to measure the aesthetic properties of wood , 2000 .

[13]  G. Gemser,et al.  How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance , 2001 .

[14]  Anders Roos,et al.  Consumer preferences for wooden and laminate flooring , 2008 .

[15]  Scott A. Bowe,et al.  Species Selection in Secondary Wood Products: Perspectives From Different Consumers , 2004 .

[16]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form , 1984 .

[17]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics , 2004 .

[18]  Anders Roos,et al.  Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: a repertory grid study , 2008 .