Environmental-Economic Analysis of Integrated Organic Waste and Wastewater Management Systems: A Case Study from Aarhus City (Denmark)

This study presents a comparative analysis of the environmental and economic performances of four integrated waste and wastewater management scenarios in the city of Aarhus in Denmark. The purpose of this analysis is to deliver decision support regarding whether (i) the installation of food waste disposers in private homes (AS1) or (ii) separate collection and transport of organic waste to biogas plants is a more viable environmental and economic solution (AS2). Higher environmental benefits, e.g., mitigation of human health impacts and climate change, are obtained by transforming the existing waste combustion system into scenario (ii). Trade-offs in terms of increased marine eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity result from moving up the waste hierarchy; i.e., from waste incineration to biogas production at wastewater treatment plants with anaerobic sludge digestion. Scenario (i) performs with lower energy efficiency compared to scenario (ii). Furthermore, when considering the uncertainty in the extra damage cost to the sewer system that may be associated to the installation of food waste disposers, scenario (ii) is the most flexible, robust, and less risky economic solution. From an economic, environmental, and resource efficiency point of view, separate collection and transport of biowaste to biogas plants is the most sustainable solution.

[1]  P. Christensen,et al.  Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) , 2011 .

[2]  Marianne Thomsen,et al.  External costs of atmospheric lead emissions from a waste-to-energy plant: a follow-up assessment of indirect exposure via topsoil ingestion. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  G. Bentzen,et al.  Controlled dosing of nitrate for prevention of H2S in a sewer network and the effects on the subsequent treatment processes , 1995 .

[4]  P. Christensen,et al.  Eco-toxicological impact of “metals” on the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem: A comparison between eight different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) , 2011 .

[5]  Eleni Iacovidou,et al.  The Household Use of Food Waste Disposal Units as a Waste Management Option: A Review , 2012 .

[6]  Michele Seghetta,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of biowaste to resource management systems – A Danish case study , 2017 .

[7]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results , 2009 .

[8]  Rong-Gang Cong,et al.  Managing soil natural capital: An effective strategy for mitigating future agricultural risks? , 2014 .

[9]  Tim D. Evans,et al.  Surahammar: a case study of the impacts of installing food waste disposers in 50% of households , 2010 .

[10]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in Denmark including sensitivity and uncertainty analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Marianne Thomsen,et al.  External costs of cadmium emissions to soil: A drawback of phosphorus fertilizers , 2014 .

[12]  T. Evans,et al.  Surahammar – a case study of the impacts of installing food waste disposers in fifty percent of households , 2010 .

[13]  M. J. Chadwick,et al.  Environmental impacts of coal mining and utilization , 1987 .

[14]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Chemical composition of material fractions in Danish household waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[15]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[16]  Rong-Gang Cong,et al.  Valuing Supporting Soil Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: A Natural Capital Approach , 2015 .