How common is the funnel‐like energy landscape in protein‐protein interactions?

The goal of this study is to verify the concept of the funnel‐like intermolecular energy landscape in protein–protein interactions by use of a series of computational experiments. Our preliminary analysis revealed the existence of the funnel in many protein–protein interactions. However, because of the uncertainties in the modeling of these interactions and the ambiguity of the analysis procedures, the detection of the funnels requires detailed quantitative approaches to the energy landscape analysis. A number of such approaches are presented in this study. We show that the funnel detection problem is equivalent to a problem of distinguishing between distributions of low‐energy intermolecular matches in the funnel and in the low‐frequency landscape fluctuations. If the fluctuations are random, the decision about whether the minimum is the funnel is equivalent to determining whether this minimum is significantly different from a would‐be random one. A database of 475 nonredundant cocrystallized protein–protein complexes was used to re‐dock the proteins by use of smoothed potentials. To detect the funnel, we developed a set of sophisticated models of random matches. The funnel was considered detected if the binding area was more populated by the low‐energy docking predictions than by the matches generated in the random models. The number of funnels detected by use of different random models varied significantly. However, the results confirmed that the funnel may be the general feature in protein–protein association.

[1]  A Sali,et al.  Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1996, Molecular medicine today.

[2]  nirvikar Saran.  Text-Book on Spherical Astronomy , 1931, Nature.

[3]  Garland R. Marshall,et al.  A potential smoothing algorithm accurately predicts transmembrane helix packing , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  I. Vakser,et al.  Identification of the Binding Site on Cytochrome P450 2B4 for Cytochrome b 5 and Cytochrome P450 Reductase* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  I. Vakser,et al.  Evaluation of GRAMM low‐resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin‐antibody complex , 1997, Proteins.

[8]  Francis Rodier,et al.  Protein–protein interaction at crystal contacts , 1995, Proteins.

[9]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Scheraga,et al.  On the multiple-minima problem in the conformational analysis of molecules: deformation of the potential energy hypersurface by the diffusion equation method , 1989 .

[12]  H. A. Scheraga,et al.  Application of the diffusion equation method of global optimization to water clusters , 1992 .

[13]  S. Vajda,et al.  Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid‐body protein‐protein docking , 2000, Proteins.

[14]  I. Vakser.  Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[15]  J A McCammon,et al.  Theory of biomolecular recognition. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  I. Vakser,et al.  Main-chain complementarity in protein-protein recognition. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[17]  I. Vakser.  Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[18]  Charlotte M. Deane,et al.  JOY: protein sequence-structure representation and analysis , 1998, Bioinform..

[19]  Oliviero Carugo,et al.  Protein—protein crystal‐packing contacts , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  G H Loew,et al.  Construction of a 3D model of cytochrome P450 2B4. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[21]  I. Vakser,et al.  A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein--protein complexes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  K. Dill.  Polymer principles and protein folding , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. , 1985, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[25]  C. Aflalo,et al.  Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques , 1994, Proteins.

[26]  H. Wolfson,et al.  A dataset of protein-protein interfaces generated with a sequence-order-independent comparison technique. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  I A Vakser.  Long-distance potentials: an approach to the multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction. , 1996, Protein engineering.