A fuzzy-AHP approach to prioritization of CS attributes in target planning for automotive product development

Understanding customer requirements and incorporating them into the conceptual vehicle design is the first step of automotive product development (PD). However, lack of quantitative data and undefined relationships between the attributes makes it difficult to develop a quantitative model for analyzing subjective customer satisfaction (CS) attributes. While researchers and practitioners have accomplished a significant success in terms of developing tool such as quality function deployment (QFD) to capture the voice of customers, and mathematical models for selecting engineering design alternatives, there is limited precedence in terms of prior works on customer satisfaction driven quality improvement target planning and prioritization of customer satisfaction attributes for target planning. This paper presents a fuzzy set theory based analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy-AHP) framework for prioritizing CS attributes in target planning. Furthermore, unlike prior QFD papers, we consider a broad range of strategic and tactical factors for determining the weights. These weights are then incorporated into target planning by identifying the gap in the current CS level. A case example from automotive industry is presented to demonstrate efficacy of the proposed methodology. The framework has been implemented on MS Excel(R) so that the industry can easily adopt it with limited amount of training and at no additional software cost.

[1]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[2]  Jun Wang,et al.  A Group Decision Support Approach to Evaluate Experts for R&D Project Selection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  O. P. Gandhi,et al.  RUL assessment of lube oil using AHP and vector projection approach , 2006 .

[4]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  Customer satisfaction driven quality improvement target planning for product development in automotive industry , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation , 1980 .

[6]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  DEVELOPING A BUSINESS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHICAL MODEL , 1995 .

[7]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods , 1999 .

[8]  L. Hongre,et al.  IDENTIFYING THE MOST PROMISING BUSINESS MODEL BY USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPROACH , 2006 .

[9]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[10]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[11]  Bülent Çatay,et al.  Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP , 2007 .

[12]  G. Barbarosoglu,et al.  CAPITAL RATIONING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 1995 .

[13]  Randy R. Bruegman Exceeding Customer Expectations , 2002 .

[14]  Michael Angelo Baliwag Promentilla Development of multiple criteria decision making method for remedial countermeasures of contaminated sites , 2006 .

[15]  Shing I. Chang,et al.  An integrated group decision-making approach to quality function deployment , 1999 .

[16]  Godwin G. Udo Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[17]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment , 2002, J. Intell. Manuf..

[18]  M. A. Mustafa,et al.  Project risk assessment using the analytic hierarchy process , 1991 .

[19]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science , 1988 .

[20]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[21]  Chong Wu,et al.  An integrated method for supplier selection in SCM , 2005, Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005..

[22]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Adrian Ashurst Exceeding customer expectations in care homes , 2008 .