Effect of higher frequency on the classification of steady-state visual evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE Most existing brain-computer interface (BCI) designs based on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) primarily use low frequency visual stimuli (e.g., <20 Hz) to elicit relatively high SSVEP amplitudes. While low frequency stimuli could evoke photosensitivity-based epileptic seizures, high frequency stimuli generally show less visual fatigue and no stimulus-related seizures. The fundamental objective of this study was to investigate the effect of stimulation frequency and duty-cycle on the usability of an SSVEP-based BCI system. APPROACH We developed an SSVEP-based BCI speller using multiple LEDs flickering with low frequencies (6-14.9 Hz) with a duty-cycle of 50%, or higher frequencies (26-34.7 Hz) with duty-cycles of 50%, 60%, and 70%. The four different experimental conditions were tested with 26 subjects in order to investigate the impact of stimulation frequency and duty-cycle on performance and visual fatigue, and evaluated with a questionnaire survey. Resting state alpha powers were utilized to interpret our results from the neurophysiological point of view. MAIN RESULTS The stimulation method employing higher frequencies not only showed less visual fatigue, but it also showed higher and more stable classification performance compared to that employing relatively lower frequencies. Different duty-cycles in the higher frequency stimulation conditions did not significantly affect visual fatigue, but a duty-cycle of 50% was a better choice with respect to performance. The performance of the higher frequency stimulation method was also less susceptible to resting state alpha powers, while that of the lower frequency stimulation method was negatively correlated with alpha powers. SIGNIFICANCE These results suggest that the use of higher frequency visual stimuli is more beneficial for performance improvement and stability as time passes when developing practical SSVEP-based BCI applications.

[1]  D. Lindsley,et al.  Visual Evoked Potentials as a Function of Flash Luminance and Duration , 1964, Science.

[2]  D Regan,et al.  Evoked potential and psychophysical correlates of changes in stimulus colour and intensity. , 1970, Vision research.

[3]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[4]  Shigenobu Nakamura,et al.  Objective evaluation of fatigue by event-related potentials , 1998, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[5]  Murray W. Johns,et al.  A sleep physiologist's view of the drowsy driver , 2000 .

[6]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  M.M. Moore,et al.  Real-world applications for brain-computer interface technology , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Kim Dremstrup Nielsen,et al.  Communication speed enhancement for visual based Brain Computer Interfaces , 2004 .

[9]  A. Wilkins,et al.  Photic‐ and Pattern‐induced Seizures: A Review for the Epilepsy Foundation of America Working Group , 2005, Epilepsia.

[10]  John R. Smith,et al.  Steady-State VEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface Control in an Immersive 3D Gaming Environment , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[11]  Gao Xiaorong,et al.  Brain-computer interface based on the high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 First International Conference on Neural Interface and Control, 2005..

[12]  M Ramasubba Reddy,et al.  A novel multiple frequency stimulation method for steady state VEP based brain computer interfaces , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[13]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency Recognition Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface. , 2006, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  The Berlin brain-computer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Moghavvemi,et al.  Development of a steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain computer interface (BCI) system , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems.

[18]  Mahmoud Moghavvemi,et al.  Assessment of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential for Brain Computer Communication , 2007 .

[19]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Temporal kernel CCA and its application in multimodal neuronal data analysis , 2010, Machine Learning.

[21]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[22]  Gary Garcia Molina,et al.  Spatial filters to detect steady-state visual evoked potentials elicited by high frequency stimulation: BCI application , 2010, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[23]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  A Cell-Phone Based Brain-Computer Interface for Communication in Daily Life , 2010, AICI.

[24]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Optimization of SSVEP brain responses with application to eight-command Brain–Computer Interface , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  B. Blankertz,et al.  (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[26]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  B. Allison,et al.  BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  A Self-Paced and Calibration-Less SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interface Speller , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  M S Treder,et al.  Gaze-independent brain–computer interfaces based on covert attention and feature attention , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  Po-Lei Lee,et al.  An SSVEP-Based BCI Using High Duty-Cycle Visual Flicker , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  SSVEP-based Bremen–BCI interface—boosting information transfer rates , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[32]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  Pablo F. Diez,et al.  Asynchronous BCI control using high-frequency SSVEP , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[34]  Yijun Wang,et al.  A high-speed BCI based on code modulation VEP , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  Spelling with non-invasive Brain–Computer Interfaces – Current and future trends , 2011, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[36]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[37]  A Graser,et al.  BCI Demographics II: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use a High-Frequency SSVEP BCI? , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Development of an SSVEP-based BCI spelling system adopting a QWERTY-style LED keyboard , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online Adaptation of a c-VEP Brain-Computer Interface(BCI) Based on Error-Related Potentials and Unsupervised Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  Yangsong Zhang,et al.  Prediction of SSVEP-based BCI performance by the resting-state EEG network , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[41]  Jason Farquhar,et al.  Eliciting steady state visual evoked potentials near the visual perception threshold , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[42]  Fanglin Chen,et al.  A novel hybrid BCI speller based on the incorporation of SSVEP into the P300 paradigm , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[43]  Mário Sarcinelli-Filho,et al.  Commanding a robotic wheelchair with a high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential based brain-computer interface. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[44]  Po-Lei Lee,et al.  Adaptive SSVEP-Based BCI System With Frequency and Pulse Duty-Cycle Stimuli Tuning Design , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[45]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  An Efficient ERP-Based Brain-Computer Interface Using Random Set Presentation and Face Familiarity , 2014, PloS one.

[46]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Visual and Auditory Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  SPoC: A novel framework for relating the amplitude of neuronal oscillations to behaviorally relevant parameters , 2014, NeuroImage.

[48]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Predicting BCI Subject Performance Using Probabilistic Spatio-Temporal Filters , 2014, PloS one.

[49]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  A lower limb exoskeleton control system based on steady state visual evoked potentials , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[50]  Yang Yu,et al.  A Dynamically Optimized SSVEP Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Speller , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[51]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Detection of braking intention in diverse situations during simulated driving based on EEG feature combination , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[52]  Rami Saab,et al.  A Hybrid Brain–Computer Interface Based on the Fusion of P300 and SSVEP Scores , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[53]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Learning From More Than One Data Source: Data Fusion Techniques for Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[54]  Seong-Whan Lee,et al.  Decoding Three-Dimensional Trajectory of Executed and Imagined Arm Movements From Electroencephalogram Signals , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[55]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Multivariate Machine Learning Methods for Fusing Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging Data , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[56]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  EEG-based classification of video quality perception using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.