Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production

We examine in a laboratory setting how direct participation in choosing a principle of distributive justice and a tax system impinges on subjects' attitudes and subsequent productivity when they participate in a task, produce income, and then experience losses or gains according to the tax system. Experience with a redistributive principle and its associated taxation system in a production environment does not detract from overall acceptance of the distributive principle, particularly for subjects who participate in choosing the principle. Participation in discussion, choice, and production increases subjects' convictions regarding their preferences. For these subjects (especially recipients of transfers) productivity rises significantly over the course of the experiments. No such effect is evident for subjects who do not participate in setting the regime under which they are to labor. The results' implications for questions of democratic participation and the stability of income support programs are drawn.

[1]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Choices of Principles of Distributive Justice in Experimental Groups , 1987 .

[2]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Laboratory Results on Rawls's Distributive Justice , 1987, British Journal of Political Science.

[3]  R. Kanter.  From status to contribution: some organizational implications of the changing basis for pay. , 1987, Personnel.

[4]  G. Jasso.  A new representation of the just term in distributive‐justice theory: Its properties and operation in theoretical derivation and empirical estimation , 1986 .

[5]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Justice in social relations , 1986 .

[6]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. , 1986 .

[7]  Matthew L. Spitzer,et al.  Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice , 1985, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[8]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Equity and Justice in Social Behavior , 1982 .

[9]  K. Sołtan.  Empirical Studies of Distributive Justice , 1982, Ethics.

[10]  Guillermina Jasso,et al.  A New Theory of Distributive Justice , 1980 .

[11]  J. Roemer,et al.  Rawlsian Justice as the Core of a Game , 1980 .

[12]  P. Brickman,et al.  Preference for Inequality. , 1977 .

[13]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. , 1977 .

[14]  G. Smith.  ANARCHY, STATE, AND UTOPIA , 1976 .

[15]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[17]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[18]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking , 1953, Journal of Political Economy.