Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that harbors KRAS mutations in exon 2 do not benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Other activating RAS mutations may also be negative predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy. METHODS In this prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) as compared with FOLFOX4 alone, according to RAS (KRAS or NRAS) or BRAF mutation status. A total of 639 patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without KRAS mutations in exon 2 had results for at least one of the following: KRAS exon 3 or 4; NRAS exon 2, 3, or 4; or BRAF exon 15. The overall rate of ascertainment of RAS status was 90%. RESULTS Among 512 patients without RAS mutations, progression-free survival was 10.1 months with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus 7.9 months with FOLFOX4 alone (hazard ratio for progression or death with combination therapy, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.90; P=0.004). Overall survival was 26.0 months in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 group versus 20.2 months in the FOLFOX4-alone group (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; P=0.04). A total of 108 patients (17%) with nonmutated KRAS exon 2 had other RAS mutations. These mutations were associated with inferior progression-free survival and overall survival with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment, which was consistent with the findings in patients with KRAS mutations in exon 2. BRAF mutations were a negative prognostic factor. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS Additional RAS mutations predicted a lack of response in patients who received panitumumab-FOLFOX4. In patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without RAS mutations, improvements in overall survival were observed with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 therapy. (Funded by Amgen and others; PRIME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00364013.).

[1]  C. Tournigand,et al.  Panitumumab combined with irinotecan for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: a GERCOR efficacy, tolerance, and translational molecular study. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Massively Parallel Tumor Multigene Sequencing to Evaluate Response to Panitumumab in a Randomized Phase III Study of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Mutant KRAS codon 12 and 13 alleles in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: assessment as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to panitumumab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  John D Potter,et al.  BRAF Mutation Status and Survival after Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis According to Patient and Tumor Characteristics , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[6]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN mutations: implications for targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Larissa V Furtado,et al.  Frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer , 2011, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[10]  A. Fernández-Medarde,et al.  Ras in cancer and developmental diseases. , 2011, Genes & cancer.

[11]  Mingming Jia,et al.  COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  V. Lemmens,et al.  The BRAF V600E mutation is an independent prognostic factor for survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2010, JAMA.

[16]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  Barry S Taylor,et al.  Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. , 2010, Cancer research.

[18]  R. Pearson,et al.  Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2010 .

[19]  G. Fontanini,et al.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  P. Jänne,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of EGFR T790M in Gefitinib or Erlotinib Resistant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  F.A.M. Bordonaba,et al.  Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2009 .

[22]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Ras oncogenes: split personalities , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Mutations in the LKB1 tumour suppressor are frequently detected in tumours from Caucasian but not Asian lung cancer patients , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  J. Stachura,et al.  KRAS mutation profile in colorectal carcinoma and novel mutation--internal tandem duplication in KRAS. , 2008, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[26]  J. Manola,et al.  TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  SurveyorTM nuclease-based detection of p53 gene mutations in haematological malignancy , 2007, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[28]  Sarah Edkins,et al.  Recurrent KRAS codon 146 mutations in human colorectal cancer , 2006, Cancer biology & therapy.

[29]  M. Stratton,et al.  Similarity of the phenotypic patterns associated with BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal neoplasia. , 2002, Cancer research.

[30]  H. Kindler,et al.  Metastatic colorectal cancer , 2001, Current treatment options in oncology.

[31]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.