Promoting Bioethanol Production through Clean Development Mechanism: Findings and lessons learnt from ASIATIC project

Global climate change mitigation policies call for increasing use of biomass fuels as renewable substitutes to fossil energy resources. Quantified targets for biofuels introduction in to the market exist in the United States, the European Union, and a number of developing countries. In this context, mixing biologically produced ethanol with conventional gasoline represents an attractive technical option allowing for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and lessening the dependence on non-renewable petrol in the transportation sector. This paper investigates technological and socio-economic aspects of ethanol production in developing countries, particularly in China, with special focus on determining eligibility of bioethanol projects for Clean Development Mechanism. Basing on the findings of the ASIATIC study (Agriculture and Small to Medium Scale Industries in Peri-urban Areas through Ethanol Production for Transport In China), we analyse how alcohol fuels can be produced in a sustainable way with mutual benefits between rural and urban people. The bioethanol production cost and life cycle CO2eq emissions were calculated for six different types of feedstock: sugarcane, sugarcane molasses, sweet sorghum juice, cassava, corn, and sorghum bagasse. Implications of the CDM rules and procedures for bioethanol industry were examined under the angles of environmental and economical additionality, and conformity with the principles of sustainable development. It is found that the starch-based (cassava) ethanol production path has the greatest potential for market penetration in China, followed by the conversion route using sugar-based feedstock (sorghum juice, sugarcane molasses). Meanwhile, the lignocelluloses biomass - to - ethanol technology may represent the highest interest for implementation as Clean Development Mechanism project.

[1]  Dennis R. Keeney,et al.  Biomass as an energy source for the midwestern U.S. , 1992 .

[2]  R. Price,et al.  Oil Price Developments: Drivers, Economic Consequences and Policy Responses , 2004 .

[3]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  Defining Investment Additionality for CDM projects—practical approaches , 2003 .

[4]  M. Ruth,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios , 1999 .

[5]  Christoph Berg,et al.  6 – World fuel ethanol – analysis and outlook , 2004 .

[6]  B. Laponche,et al.  The green paper «Towards a European Strategy for the security of energy supply » , 2001 .

[7]  E. Gnansounou,et al.  Ethanol fuel from biomass: A review , 2005 .

[8]  David Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol fuels: Energy security, economics, and the environment , 1991 .

[9]  Zhiyuan Hu,et al.  Economics, environment, and energy life cycle assessment of automobiles fueled by bio-ethanol blends in China , 2004 .

[10]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[11]  English Only,et al.  BIOFUELS - ADVANTAGES AND TRADE BARRIERS* , 2005 .

[12]  Semida Silveira,et al.  Promoting bioenergy through the clean development mechanism , 2005 .

[13]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2004 , 2004 .

[14]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment , 2003 .

[15]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[16]  J. Howes,et al.  TECHNOLOGY STATUS REVIEW AND CARBON ABATEMENT POTENTIAL OF RENEWABLE TRANSPORT FUELS IN THE UK , 2003 .

[17]  Urs Springer The Market for Tradable GHG Permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A Survey of Model Studies , 2002 .