Is masked neighbor priming inhibitory? Evidence using the incremental priming technique.

To investigate neighbor effects in visual word recognition, the masked priming technique holds considerable advantages over unprimed methods, because a target word is used as its own control. However, inhibitory neighbor effects obtained with masked priming are still open for different interpretations, because the primes differ across conditions. Given this theoretical problem, it is useful to investigate neighbor priming effects using a prime as its own control. This option is available in the incremental priming technique (Jacobs, Grainger, & Ferrand, 1995), in which a within-condition baseline is created by comparing the response times (RTs) to a target when it is primed at different prime durations. In this study, we examined masked neighbor priming using this technique. Both the traditional and the within-condition baseline indicated that masked neighbor word priming is inhibitory in nature. The results are discussed in terms of current theories of visual word recognition.

[1]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language , 2000 .

[2]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .

[4]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns , 2000 .

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990 .

[8]  J. Morton.  7 – A Functional Model for Memory1 , 1970 .

[9]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[11]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[14]  Derek Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: A dissociation of lexical and semantic processing. , 1990, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

[15]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: the effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.

[19]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[20]  R. Bijeljac-Babic,et al.  Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Models Of Human Memory , 1970 .

[22]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Testing the multiple in the multiple read-out model of visual word recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[24]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[25]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[26]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[28]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[30]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[31]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[32]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[33]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[34]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  A validation study of the age-of-acquisition norms collected by Ghyselinck, De Moor, & Brysbaert , 2000 .

[35]  J Grainger,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  T. Verguts,et al.  When are neighbours hostile? Inhibitory neighbour effects in visual word recognition , 2006, Psychological research.

[37]  S. Mathey.  L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. , 2001 .