Abdominal wall reconstruction using biosynthetic absorbable mesh in high-risk complex ventral hernia.

BACKGROUND Biosynthetic mesh may represent an improvement on biological and large pore synthetic meshes for high-risk complex ventral hernia repair. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of polyglycolic acid (PGA):trimethylene carbonate (TMC) biosynthetic mesh for reinforcement of the midline fascial closure in a single-stage repair of complex ventral hernias in high-risk patients. METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken for patients who underwent a planned open single-stage complex ventral hernia repair with a single unit of PGA:TMC biosynthetic mesh between May 2013 and August 2017. Data on outcome variables were recorded and quality of life assessed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) instrument. RESULTS Overall, 56 patients underwent abdominal wall reconstruction for complex ventral hernias. All meshes were placed in the retrorectus position. Some 39% underwent component separation. The majority of patients (86%, n = 48) had high risk (grade 2 or 3) hernias according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group classification. Overall hernia recurrence rate was 3.6% (n = 2). Postoperative surgical site infection occurred in 26.8% (n = 15). Median follow-up by clinical examination was 6 months (range 4–17). Median telephone follow-up was 21 months (range 4–54). Pre- and post-treatment SF-12 quality of life assessments demonstrated significant improvements in both the physical and mental components. CONCLUSION This study reports a large series of abdominal wall reconstructions using biosynthetic mesh in complex ventral hernia. The findings indicate promising early outcome data associated with use of biosynthetic mesh. Larger well-controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed for confirmation of these findings.

[1]  S. Reggio,et al.  Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Utilizing the Combination of Absorbable and Permanent Mesh in a Retromuscular Position: A Multicenter Prospective Study , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  H. Scheuerlein,et al.  What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction? , 2018, Hernia.

[3]  J. Roth,et al.  Ventral hernia repair with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Major Complex Abdominal Wall Repair in Contaminated Fields with Use of a Non-cross-linked Biologic Mesh: A Dual-Institutional Experience , 2017, World Journal of Surgery.

[5]  B. Heniford,et al.  The effect of component separation technique on quality of life (QOL) and surgical outcomes in complex open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  G. Fried,et al.  Biologic mesh for repair of ventral hernias in contaminated fields: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  K. Itani,et al.  Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review. , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[8]  B. Ramshaw,et al.  Value-based Clinical Quality Improvement (CQI) for Patients Undergoing Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. , 2015, Surgical technology international.

[9]  M. Goldblatt,et al.  Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[10]  B. Heniford,et al.  The current status of biosynthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair. , 2014, Surgical technology international.

[11]  G. Kowdley,et al.  Biological Mesh in Contaminated Fields—Overuse without Data: A Systematic Review of Their Use in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction , 2014, The American surgeon.

[12]  H. Goor,et al.  Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia , 2014, Hernia.

[13]  Jun Liu,et al.  Bovine versus Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  M. Rosen,et al.  Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  K. Patel,et al.  Complications of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  K. Itani,et al.  A Decade of Ventral Incisional Hernia Repairs with Biologic Acellular Dermal Matrix: What Have We Learned? , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  K. LeBlanc,et al.  Complex Hernia Repair Using Component Separation Technique Paired with Intraperitoneal Acellular Porcine Dermis and Synthetic Mesh Overlay , 2011, Annals of plastic surgery.

[18]  M. Rosen,et al.  Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. , 2010, Surgery.

[19]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Impact of mesh use on morbidity following ventral hernia repair with a simultaneous bowel resection. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[20]  M. Rosen Article Commentary: Biologic Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Critical Appraisal , 2010, The American surgeon.

[21]  G. Campanelli,et al.  Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias , 2009, Hernia.

[22]  D. Vargo,et al.  Acellular dermal matrix in the management of high-risk abdominal wall defects. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[23]  R. Stoppa The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias , 1989, World Journal of Surgery.

[24]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[25]  Jon S Thompson,et al.  Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. , 1998, The American surgeon.

[26]  M. Gilchrist Recommendations for Preventing the Spread of Vancomycin Resistance , 1995, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.