Effects of position of speed limit signs and the presence of speed camera on Malaysian drivers’ speed choice: An eye-tracking study

Abstract Speeding is one of the most common driving violations in the world including in Malaysia. Reducing speed-related fatalities is one of Malaysia’s strategies to improve road safety. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of speed limit sign positioning and the presence of speed camera on drivers’ judgments about the appropriate speed to drive and their associated eye movements. Twenty participants took part in the study, and thirty two images of roads with a range of actual speed limits were presented. In each picture the displayed speed limit was edited to 30% lower than what participants think is appropriate on average. Speed limit signs were either presented on the road or on the speed limit sign boards at the road sides, and a speed camera sign was either present or not. Drivers judged a lower appropriate speed to drive when the camera sign was present than absent, while there was a wider spread of differences between judged and displayed speed when the speed limit sign was presented on the board than on the road. Drivers were quicker in fixating and looked more at the general area in which the speed limit sign appeared. Therefore drivers’ visual attention across scenes may be manipulated by the sign positions. These low-cost interventions could be useful in managing speed choice in Malaysia.

[1]  P. Chapman,et al.  Visual Search of Driving Situations: Danger and Experience , 1998, Perception.

[2]  D Solomon,et al.  Accidents on main rural highways related to speed, driver, and vehicle , 1964 .

[3]  R Elvik,et al.  Evaluations of road accident blackspot treatment: a case of the Iron Law of Evaluation Studies? , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Charles Goldenbeld,et al.  The credibility of speed limits on 80 km/h rural roads: The effects of road and person(ality) characteristics. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  David Crundall,et al.  Cross-cultural effects on drivers’ hazard perception , 2013 .

[6]  David Crundall,et al.  Cross-cultural effects on detecting multiple sources of driving hazard: Evidence from the deceleration detection flicker test , 2020 .

[7]  David Crundall,et al.  A comparison of hazard perception and hazard prediction tests across China, Spain and the UK. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Anne Harris,et al.  In the driver's seat: understanding young adults' driving behaviour , 2005 .

[9]  Thomas H. Rockwell,et al.  Two Views of Motorist Behavior in Rural Freeway Construction and Maintenance Zones: The Driver and the State Highway Patrolman , 1983 .

[10]  Siang Yew Chong,et al.  The effect of speed limit credibility on drivers' speed choice , 2017 .

[11]  John Golias,et al.  A survey of drivers' attitudes toward speed limit violations , 1995 .

[12]  Ingrid van Schagen,et al.  Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Kate M Blincoe,et al.  Speeding drivers' attitudes and perceptions of speed cameras in rural England. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Peter Chapman,et al.  How does drivers' visual search change as a function of experience? A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Yee Mun Lee,et al.  Cross-cultural effects on the perception and appraisal of approaching motorcycles at junctions , 2015 .

[16]  David Crundall,et al.  A predictive hazard perception paradigm differentiates driving experience cross-culturally , 2014 .

[17]  Stefan Brandenburg,et al.  Improving homogeneity by dynamic speed limit systems. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Bg Heydecker,et al.  A cost recovery system for speed and red-light cameras: two-year pilot evaluation. Research Paper, 11 February 2003, Department for Transport , 2003 .

[19]  Joewono Prasetijo,et al.  Intelligent speed adaptation: Preliminary results of on-road study in Penang, Malaysia , 2013 .

[20]  W J Frith,et al.  The relative effectiveness of a hidden versus a visible speed camera programme. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.