Numerical simulation of aneurysmal haemodynamics with calibrated porous-medium models of flow-diverting stents.

Modelling flow-diverting (FD) stents as porous media (PM) markedly improves the efficiency of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations in the study of intracranial aneurysm treatment. Nonetheless, the parameters of PM models adopted for simulations up until now were rarely calibrated to match the represented FD structure. We therefore sought to evaluate the PM parameters for a representative variety of commercially available stents, so characterising the flow-diversion behaviours of different FD devices on the market. We generated fully-resolved geometries for treatments using PED, Silk+, FRED, and dual PED stents. We then correspondingly derived the calibrated PM parameters-permeability (k) and inertial resistance factor (C2)-for each stent design from CFD simulations, to ensure the calibrated PM model has identical flow resistance to the FD stent it represents. With each of the calibrated PM models respectively deployed in two aneurysms, we studied the flow-diversion effects of these stent configurations. This work for the first time reported several sets of parameters for PM models, which is vital to address the current knowledge gap and rectify the errors in PM model simulations, thereby setting right the modelling protocol for future studies using PM models. The flow resistance parameters were strongly affected by porosity and effective thickness of the commercial stents, and thus accounted for in the PM models. Flow simulations using the PM stent models revealed differences in aneurysmal mass flowrate (MFR) and energy loss (EL) between various stent designs. This study improves the practicability of FD simulation by using calibrated PM models, providing an individualised method with improved simulation efficiency and accuracy.

[1]  Ricardo J. Komotar,et al.  Hemodynamic mechanisms underlying cerebral aneurysm pathogenesis , 2011, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Intracranial Stents Being Modeled as a Porous Medium: Flow Simulation in Stented Cerebral Aneurysms , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  J. Raymond,et al.  The Varying Porosity of Braided Self-Expanding Stents and Flow Diverters: An Experimental Study , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  David Hasan,et al.  Review of Cerebral Aneurysm Formation, Growth, and Rupture , 2013, Stroke.

[5]  Hui Meng,et al.  Comparison of Two Stents in Modifying Cerebral Aneurysm Hemodynamics , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Toshio Nakayama,et al.  Parametric study of porous media as substitutes for flow-diverter stent , 2015 .

[7]  F. Mut,et al.  Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms , 2014, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[8]  Jacqueline Birks,et al.  Early Experience in the Treatment of Intra-Cranial Aneurysms by Endovascular Flow Diversion: A Multicentre Prospective Study , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  Y. Qian,et al.  Computational Hemodynamics Analysis of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow Diverters: Correlation with Clinical Outcomes , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[10]  H. Meng,et al.  Saccular aneurysms on straight and curved vessels are subject to different hemodynamics: implications of intravascular stenting. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  P. Ringleb,et al.  The FRED Flow-Diverter Stent for Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  Y Zhang,et al.  Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Makoto Ohta,et al.  Haemodynamic effects of stent diameter and compaction ratio on flow-diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A numerical study of a successful and an unsuccessful case. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M Raschi,et al.  Strategy for modeling flow diverters in cerebral aneurysms as a porous medium , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[15]  W. Poon,et al.  Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Current status and ongoing clinical trials , 2011, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  M Umezu,et al.  Risk Analysis of Unruptured Aneurysms Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Technology: Preliminary Results , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  R. Blanc,et al.  An in vitro study of silk stent morphology , 2011, Neuroradiology.

[18]  E. Raz,et al.  Variable Porosity of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Straight and Curved Vessels: A Guide for Optimal Deployment Strategy , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  A. Divani,et al.  Intracranial Aneurysms: Review of Current Treatment Options and Outcomes , 2011, Front. Neur..