Ethical issues in endoscopy: patient satisfaction, safety in elderly patients, palliation, and relations with industry

The explosive development of gastroenterology and gastrointestinal endoscopy over the past few years, with clinical trials of powerful new drugs and top-quality endoscopes and accessories, has led to a huge increase in the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of modern gastroenterology. At the same time the percentage of elderly people in Europe has increased, patients attending gastrointestinal endoscopy units are expecting to undergo painless endoscopy procedures, and palliative endoscopic therapy is increasingly being used for patients with lethal gastrointestinal diseases. This new environment presents a number of ethical issues and necessitates an updated consensus applicable in the clinical practice of gastroenterology. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the Organisation Mondiale d’Endoscopie Digestive (OMED), in collaborationwith the United European Gastroenterology Federation (UEGF), organized the Second European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy on the island of Kos, Greece, in July 2006. Twenty-three expert gastroenterologists, surgeons, and scientists from the biomedical industry participated in four workshops, aiming to formulate a consensus statement after presentation of the topics, discussion, and voting in a plenary session. We are happy to present these consensus reports here in Endoscopy and hope that they will help our colleagues in their clinical practice. Workshop 1: Patient satisfaction with endoscopy !

[1]  J. Fondras.  Soins palliatifs et soins de support en oncologie. Définitions, présupposés et enjeux , 2008 .

[2]  J. Rey,et al.  Use of Sedation for Routine Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members , 2007, Digestion.

[3]  S. Ladas.  Informed Consent: Still Far from Ideal? , 2006, Digestion.

[4]  Paul M Ridker,et al.  Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005. , 2006, JAMA.

[5]  P. Eikelenboom,et al.  Risk Factors and Prediction of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Hip‐Surgery Patients: Implementation and Validation of a Medical Risk Factor Model , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  A. Daar,et al.  Lessons on Ethical Decision Making from the Bioscience Industry , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[7]  C. Novas.  What Is the Bioscience Industry Doing to Address the Ethical Issues It Faces? , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[8]  R. Enns.  Palliation in Gastroduodenal Obstruction , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  R. Fanelli,et al.  ASGE guideline: modifications in endoscopic practice for the elderly. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  V. Rayward-Smith,et al.  Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures in the Elderly: Getting Safer but Still Not Nearly Safe Enough , 2006 .

[11]  M. Pitt,et al.  Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[12]  K. Paterson,et al.  Ethics and pharmaceutical medicine – the full report of the Ethical Issues Committee of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK , 2006, International journal of clinical practice.

[13]  M. Kateri,et al.  Hospitalization rates for cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis doubled for the aged population in Greece over the past 30 years , 2006, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[14]  L. Corfield,et al.  Treating non-competent patients , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Y. Kinoshita,et al.  A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. , 2005, Endoscopy.

[16]  K. Hall,et al.  American gastroenterological association future trends committee report: effects of aging of the population on gastroenterology practice, education, and research. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[17]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[18]  K. Leslie,et al.  Anaesthesia and sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy , 2005, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[19]  K. Luker,et al.  Supportive care in the cancer setting: rhetoric or reality? , 2005, Palliative medicine.

[20]  P. Malfertheiner,et al.  Prognostic influence of Barrett’s oesophagus and Helicobacter pylori infection on healing of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and symptom resolution in non-erosive GORD: report from the ProGORD study , 2005, Gut.

[21]  R. Aubry,et al.  Soins palliatifs et soins de support , 2005, Oncologie.

[22]  Fred S. Drennan,et al.  Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy. , 2006, JAMA.

[23]  Yuuichi Takahashi,et al.  Sedation-Free Colonoscopy , 2005, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[24]  A. Barkun,et al.  Sedation versus No Sedation in the Performance of Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Canadian Randomized Controlled Cost-Outcome Study , 2004, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[25]  A. Barkun,et al.  Assessing clinical generalizability in sedation studies of upper GI endoscopy. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[26]  A. Axon,et al.  Legal and Ethical Considerations: Group 4 Report , 2004, Endoscopy.

[27]  D. Faigel,et al.  Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[28]  S. Ladas,et al.  Recommendations of the ESGE Workshop on Informed Consent for Digestive Endoscopy , 2003, Endoscopy.

[29]  W. Hazzard,et al.  Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology , 2003 .

[30]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  C. Gross,et al.  Disclosure of financial competing interests in randomised controlled trials: cross sectional review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[33]  P. Malfertheiner,et al.  Informed Consent for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A 2002 ESGE Survey , 2003, Digestive Diseases.

[34]  L. Walter,et al.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. , 2001, JAMA.

[35]  T. Kaptchuk.  The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[37]  J. Tuech,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: a prospective study. , 2000, Surgical endoscopy.

[38]  S. Ladas.  Factors Predicting the Possibility of Conducting Colonoscopy Without Sedation , 2000, Endoscopy.

[39]  Ladas Sd.  Factors predicting the possibility of conducting colonoscopy without sedation. , 2000 .

[40]  Black Wc,et al.  When should we stop screening , 2000 .

[41]  J. Devière,et al.  Self-expandable metal stents. , 1999, Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology.

[42]  B White,et al.  Measuring patient satisfaction: how to do it and why to bother. , 1999, Family practice management.

[43]  M. Lazzaroni,et al.  Premedication, Preparation, and Surveillance , 1999, Endoscopy.

[44]  M. Garraway,et al.  Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys , 1996, BMJ.

[45]  D. Drossman,et al.  A preliminary study of patients' concerns related to GI endoscopy. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[46]  K J Rothman,et al.  The continuing unethical use of placebo controls. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  J. Church,et al.  Colonoscopy — how difficult, how painful? , 1994, Surgical Endoscopy.

[48]  G. Tytgat,et al.  Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction , 1992, The Lancet.

[49]  A. Kruse,et al.  Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. , 1989, Gut.

[50]  P. Cotton,et al.  RANDOMISED TRIAL OF ENDOSCOPIC VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS STENT INSERTION IN MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE , 1987, The Lancet.

[51]  T. Evans.  Anesthesia for the geriatric patient. , 1981, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[52]  B. Gandevia,et al.  DECLARATION OF HELSINKI , 1964, Definitions.

[53]  I. Maetani,et al.  Comparison of duodenal stent placement with surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation in patients with duodenal obstructions caused by pancreaticobiliary malignancies. , 2004, Endoscopy.

[54]  I. Maetani.  Placement of duodenal stent for palliation in patients with duodenal obstructions caused by pancreatobiliary malignancies compared with surgical gastrojejunostomy , 2002 .

[55]  S. Eckstein.  Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2001, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[56]  W. Black,et al.  When should we stop screening? , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[57]  W. E. Code,et al.  Anesthesia in the geriatric patient. , 1987, Gerontion.