Traits as Goal-Based Categories: The Importance of Goals in the Coherence of Dispositional Categories

It is argued that goals are central to the meaning and structure of many traits and help define the prototypicality structure of those traits. Partly on the basis of Barsalou s (1985) work on goal-derived categories, it was predicted that goals help define the judged prototypicality of many trait-related behaviors and the confidence with which people make trait inferences from those behaviors. Consistent with this hypothesis, ratings of the extent to which behaviors achieved the goal associated with a trait strongly pred icted the typicality of the behaviors. Furthermore, the rated goal-relatedness of a behavior also strongly predicted the confidence with which people would make a trait inference from that behavior. It is suggested that goals play a major role in the conceptual coherence of traits and other social categories. What is a trait? This is a question with a long and disputatious history in psychology, and many different answers have been proposed. Recently, Miller and Read (1987,1990; Read & Miller, 1989b) argued that many traits are goal-based structures, composed of chronic, stable configurations of four components: goals, the plans that can be used to attain those goals, the resources necessary for the successful completion of those plans, and beliefs associated with the trait. Other theorists, from the early days of personality theory (e.g., Allport, 1937; Cattell, 1965; Murray, 1938) to the present (e.g., Alston, 1970, 1975; Carbonell, 1979; John, 1986; Mischel, 1973; Pervin, 1983), have also argued that goals or related concepts such as needs and motives are central to conceptions of many traits and individual differences. The aim of the present article is to provide evidence for the importance of goals as a central component of the conception of many traits and to show that goals play a critical role in the coherence of many dispositional categories. First, we examine whether the goals associated with particular traits play a major role in defining the degree of typicality or "goodness" of category membership of behaviors associated with those traits. We then examine whether the confidence with which people infer a trait from a behavior is predicted by the goal-relatedness of that behavior.

[1]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[3]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[4]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypes in Person Perception1 , 1979 .

[5]  Robert A Emmons,et al.  The personal striving approach to personality. , 1989 .

[6]  D. Medin,et al.  Relationships between similarity-based and explanation-based categorisation , 1988 .

[7]  D. Jackson Personality research form manual , 1974 .

[8]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[9]  L. Newman,et al.  Spontaneous trait inference. , 1989 .

[10]  S. Read,et al.  Why Am I Telling You This , 1987 .

[11]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Lawrence A. Pervin,et al.  Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. , 1989 .

[13]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[14]  E. Rosch Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  W. Mischel,et al.  Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. , 1977 .

[16]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. , 1986 .

[17]  D. Funder,et al.  Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  M. Rothbart,et al.  On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. , 1986 .

[19]  W. Mischel Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. , 1973, Psychological review.

[20]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology , 1987 .

[21]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[22]  J. Carbonell Subjective understanding, computer models of belief systems , 1981 .

[23]  L. A. Pervin,et al.  The content of personality inventory items. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. Brewer,et al.  A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. , 1979 .

[25]  M. Munitz,et al.  Mind Science and History , 1970 .

[26]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[27]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[28]  G. Āllport Personality: A Psychological Interpretation , 1938 .

[29]  Pervin La The stasis and flow of behavior: toward a theory of goals. , 1983 .

[30]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Denis J. Hilton,et al.  Contemporary science and natural explanation : commonsense conceptions of causality , 1988 .

[32]  Kenneth H. Craik,et al.  The Act Frequency Approach to Personality , 1983 .

[33]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[34]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[35]  William P. Alston,et al.  Traits, consistency and conceptual alternatives for personality theory. , 1975 .

[36]  R. Wilensky Planning and Understanding: A Computational Approach to Human Reasoning , 1983 .

[37]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[38]  R. Cattell The scientific analysis of personality , 1970 .

[39]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .