Development of the "performance competence evaluation measure": assessing qualitative aspects of dance performance.

The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool, the "Performance Competence Evaluation Measure" (PCEM), for the evaluation of qualitative aspects of dance performance. The project had two phases. In the first phase a literature review was conducted to examine 1. the previous development of similar measurement tools, 2. descriptions of dance technique and dance performance applicable to the development of a qualitative measurement tool, and 3. theoretical models from somatic practices that evaluate and assess qualitative aspects of movement and dance activity. The second phase involved the development of a system for using PCEM, and testing its validity and reliability. Three judges from the professional dance community volunteered to test PCEM with a sample of 20 subjects from low-intermediate to advanced classes at a university dance program. The subjects learned a dance combination and were videotaped performing it on two separate occasions, eight weeks apart. The judges reviewed the videos in random order. Logical validity of PCEM was established through assessment by two faculty members of the university dance department and the three judges. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability demonstrated correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. It was concluded that PCEM can serve as a useful measurement tool for future dance science research.

[1]  N. Briffa,et al.  Dance training intensity at 11–14 years is associated with femoral torsion in classical ballet dancers , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[2]  I. Bartenieff,et al.  Body Movement: Coping with the Environment , 1980 .

[3]  M. J. Safrit,et al.  Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science , 1986 .

[4]  Peggy Hackney,et al.  Making Connections: Total Body Integration Through Bartenieff Fundamentals , 1996 .

[5]  Sherrie Barr,et al.  Towards A Testable Hypothesis of Training Principles for the Neuromuscular Facilitation of Human Movement , 1994, Dance Research Journal.

[6]  B T Bates,et al.  The effect of trial size on statistical power. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Alan M. Nevill,et al.  Anthropometric Factors Affecting Vertical Jump Height in Ballet Dancers , 2006, Journal of Dance Medicine & Science.

[8]  Y A Féry,et al.  Unilateral Jump Behavior in Young Professional Female Ballet Dancers , 2001, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  A. Jamurtas,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF THREE MONTHS OF AEROBIC AND STRENGTH TRAINING ON SELECTED PERFORMANCE‐AND FITNESS‐RELATED PARAMETERS IN MODERN DANCE STUDENTS , 2007, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[10]  Shaw Bronner,et al.  Gender and Limb Differences in Healthy Elite Dancers: Passé Kinematics , 2006, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  M. Heim,et al.  Range of Joint Movement in Female Dancers and Nondancers Aged 8 to 16 Years , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  Eveline Golomer,et al.  Unipodal Performance and Leg Muscle Mass in Jumping Skills among Ballet Dancers , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  K. Bennell,et al.  Changes in hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in 8–11 year old novice female ballet dancers and controls: a 12 month follow up study , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Donna H. Krasnow,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis of Kinematic and Electromyographic Relationships of the Core during Forward Stepping in Beginning and Expert Dancers , 2007, Journal of Dance Medicine & Science.