Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Shepard. Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .
[2] Robert Hooke,et al. `` Direct Search'' Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems , 1961, JACM.
[3] M. Posner,et al. On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.
[4] Stephen K. Reed,et al. Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .
[5] D. Homa. Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype , 1973 .
[6] D. Homa,et al. Category Breadth and the Abstraction of Prototypical Information. , 1976 .
[7] A. Tversky,et al. Additive similarity trees , 1977 .
[8] Douglas L. Medin,et al. Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .
[9] Roger N. Shepard,et al. Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties. , 1979 .
[10] R N Shepard,et al. Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.
[11] D. Homa,et al. Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. , 1981 .
[12] R. Nosofsky. Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. , 1984 .
[13] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[14] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .
[15] R. Shepard,et al. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.
[16] R. Nosofsky. Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[17] R. Nosofsky. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .
[18] R. Shiffrin,et al. List-strength Effect: Ii. Theoretical Mechanisms , 1990 .
[19] R. Nosofsky. Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] John R. Anderson,et al. The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization. , 1991 .
[21] R. Nosofsky. Similarity Scaling and Cognitive Process Models , 1992 .
[22] J. Kruschke,et al. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.
[23] W. T. Maddox,et al. Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization , 1993 .
[24] Robert L. Goldstone. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[25] Robert L. Goldstone. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994 .
[26] S C McKinley,et al. Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[28] Thomas J. Palmeri,et al. An Exemplar-Based Random Walk Model of Speeded Classification , 1997 .
[29] R. Shiffrin,et al. A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[30] J. D. Smith,et al. Prototypes in the Mist: The Early Epochs of Category Learning , 1998 .
[31] Gerrit Storms,et al. Prototype and Exemplar-Based Information in Natural Language Categories , 2000 .
[32] Safa R. Zaki,et al. Category variability, exemplar similarity, and perceptual classification , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[33] M. Lee,et al. Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[34] Robert M Nosofsky,et al. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] M. Lee,et al. Avoiding the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling , 2003 .
[36] Tom Verguts,et al. Measures of similarity in models of categorization , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[37] D. Medin,et al. SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.
[38] D. Luce,et al. Detection and Recognition " ' , 2006 .
[39] Steven Verheyen,et al. Determining the dimensionality in spatial representations of semantic concepts , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[40] P. Viviani,et al. Categorical perception of newly learned faces , 2007 .
[41] R. Bjork,et al. Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”? , 2008 .
[42] F Gregory Ashby,et al. Initial Training With Difficult Items Facilitates Information Integration, but Not Rule-Based Category Learning , 2008, Psychological science.
[43] R. Bjork,et al. Learning Concepts and Categories , 2008, Psychological science.
[44] W. Vanpaemel,et al. In search of abstraction: The varying abstraction model of categorization , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[45] W. Vanpaemel,et al. Exemplars and prototypes in natural language concepts: A typicality-based evaluation , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[46] Jacob Feldman,et al. A rule-based presentation order facilitates category learning , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[47] P. Kellman,et al. Adaptive Sequencing in Perceptual Learning , 2010 .
[48] Adam N Sanborn,et al. Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning. , 2010, Psychological review.
[49] R. Nosofsky. Formal Approaches in Categorization: The generalized context model: an exemplar model of classification , 2011 .
[50] Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al. Formal Approaches in Categorization: Contents , 2011 .
[51] Jonathan R. Folstein,et al. How category learning affects object representations: not all morphspaces stretch alike. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[52] Bridgid Finn,et al. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect , 2012, Memory & Cognition.
[53] Sean H. K. Kang,et al. Learning Painting Styles: Spacing is Advantageous when it Promotes Discriminative Contrast , 2012 .
[54] A. Wills,et al. On the adequacy of current empirical evaluations of formal models of categorization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.
[55] Michael C. Hout,et al. Multidimensional Scaling , 2003, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.
[56] Michael C. Mozer,et al. Maximizing Students' Retention Via Spaced Review: Practical Guidance From Computational Models Of Memory , 2013, CogSci.
[57] M. Mozer,et al. When does fading enhance perceptual category learning? , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[58] Robert V. Lindsey,et al. Improving Students’ Long-Term Knowledge Retention Through Personalized Review , 2014, Psychological science.
[59] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study , 2014, Memory & cognition.
[60] Bradley C. Love,et al. Optimal Teaching for Limited-Capacity Human Learners , 2014, NIPS.
[61] F. Gregory Ashby,et al. Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition , 2014 .
[62] Wojciech Zaremba,et al. Deep Neural Networks Predict Category Typicality Ratings for Images , 2015, CogSci.
[63] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.
[64] F. Mathy,et al. The Influence of Presentation Order on Category Transfer. , 2016, Experimental psychology.
[65] Guigang Zhang,et al. Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..
[66] Thomas L. Griffiths,et al. Adapting Deep Network Features to Capture Psychological Representations: An Abridged Report , 2017, IJCAI.
[67] T. Palmeri,et al. Modelling individual difference in visual categorization , 2016, Visual cognition.
[68] Kensuke Okada,et al. A Bayesian approach to modeling group and individual differences in multidimensional scaling , 2016 .
[69] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. The Sequence of Study Changes What Information Is Attended to, Encoded, and Remembered During Category Learning , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[70] Olivia Guest,et al. What the success of brain imaging implies about the neural code , 2016, bioRxiv.
[71] R. Nosofsky,et al. On Learning Natural-Science Categories That Violate the Family-Resemblance Principle , 2017, Psychological science.
[72] R. Shiffrin,et al. Models that allow us to perceive the world more accurately also allow us to remember past events more accurately via differentiation , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.
[73] Thomas L. Griffiths,et al. Modeling human categorization of natural images using deep feature representations , 2017, CogSci.
[74] D. Baker,et al. Global analysis of protein folding using massively parallel design, synthesis, and testing , 2017, Science.
[75] Luke G. Eglington,et al. Interleaved Presentation Benefits Science Category Learning , 2017 .
[76] R. Nosofsky,et al. Tests of an Exemplar-Memory Model of Classification Learning in a High-Dimensional Natural-Science Category Domain , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[77] Robert M Nosofsky,et al. Toward the development of a feature-space representation for a complex natural category domain , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.
[78] Mark A. McDaniel,et al. A Formal Psychological Model of Classification Applied to Natural-Science Category Learning , 2018 .
[79] Craig Sanders,et al. Using Deep-Learning Representations of Complex Natural Stimuli as Input to Psychological Models of Classification , 2018, CogSci.
[80] R. Nosofsky,et al. Feature Highlighting Enhances Learning of a Complex Natural-Science Category , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[81] Bakhtyar Ahmed Mohammed,et al. using Deep Learning , 2020 .