Deep Learning-based CT Image Reconstruction: Initial Evaluation Targeting Hypovascular Hepatic Metastases.

Purpose To evaluate the effect of a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) method on the conspicuity of hypovascular hepatic metastases on abdominal CT images. Materials and Methods This retrospective study with institutional review board approval included 58 patients with hypovascular hepatic metastases. A radiologist recorded the standard deviation of attenuation in the paraspinal muscle as the image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). CNR was calculated as region of interest ([ROI]L - ROIT)/N, where ROIL is the mean liver parenchyma attenuation, ROIT, the mean tumor attenuation, and N, the noise. Two other radiologists graded the conspicuity of the liver lesion on a five-point scale where 1 is unidentifiable and 5 is detected without diagnostic compromise. Only the smallest liver lesion in each patient, classified as smaller or larger than 10 mm, was evaluated. The difference between hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) and DLR images was determined by using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results The image noise was significantly lower, and the CNR was significantly higher on DLR images than hybrid IR images (median image noise: 19.2 vs 12.8 HU, P < .001; median CNR: tumors < 10 mm: 1.9 vs 2.5; tumors > 10 mm: 1.7 vs 2.2, both P < .001). The scores for liver lesions were significantly higher for DLR images than hybrid IR images (P < .01 for both in tumors smaller or larger than 10 mm). Conclusion DLR improved the quality of abdominal CT images for the evaluation of hypovascular hepatic metastases.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  Masatoshi Hori,et al.  Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Josepa Ribes,et al.  Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[3]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on low-contrast lesion detection and image quality in abdominal CT: a 12-reader-based comparative phantom study with filtered back projection at different tube voltages , 2017, European Radiology.

[4]  Keith T. Chan,et al.  Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. , 2014, Radiology.

[5]  M. Salvatore,et al.  Detection of colo-rectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of contrast enhanced US, multidetector CT, PET/CT, and 1.5 Tesla MR with extracellular and reticulo-endothelial cell specific contrast agents , 2010, Abdominal Imaging.

[6]  Damien Racine,et al.  Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[7]  L. Boyer,et al.  Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic. , 2015, Radiology.

[8]  U. Motosugi,et al.  Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: Comparison of contrast‐enhanced CT, contrast‐enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Attenuation-based automatic tube voltage selection and tube current modulation for dose reduction at contrast-enhanced liver CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[10]  H. Svanholm,et al.  Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic , 1989, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[11]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. , 2012, Radiology.

[12]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography for the assessment of hypovascular hepatic metastases: impact of closing k-edge on image quality and lesion detectability , 2018, European Radiology.

[13]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography of the Lung: Image Quality of a Prototype Scanner , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Full and hybrid iterative reconstruction to reduce artifacts in abdominal CT for patients scanned without arm elevation , 2017, Acta radiologica.

[15]  Samuel L Brady,et al.  Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. , 2012, Radiology.

[16]  Hisashi Tanaka,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for detection of subtle hypoattenuation in early cerebral infarction: a phantom study , 2014, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[17]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[18]  Makoto Iida,et al.  Visualization of simulated small vessels on computed tomography using a model-based iterative reconstruction technique , 2017, Data in brief.

[19]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Incidence and origin of histologically confirmed liver metastases: an explorative case-study of 23,154 patients , 2016, Oncotarget.

[20]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning , 2017, Nature.

[21]  Stephanie Powell,et al.  Registration and machine learning-based automated segmentation of subcortical and cerebellar brain structures , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. Ananthakrishnan,et al.  Epidemiology of primary and secondary liver cancers. , 2006, Seminars in interventional radiology.

[23]  B. Stedman,et al.  The management of colorectal liver metastases. , 2017, Clinical radiology.

[24]  J. Stoker,et al.  Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. , 2010, Radiology.

[25]  D. Volders,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. , 2013, Radiology.

[26]  T. Murakami,et al.  Current evidence for the diagnostic value of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for liver metastasis , 2016, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[27]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[28]  S. Foley,et al.  THE IMPACT OF OBESITY ON ABDOMINAL CT RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY. , 2018, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[29]  M. Körner,et al.  Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. , 2013, Radiology.