Towards a foundation for evaluating AI planners

This paper presents criteria for evaluating AI planners; these criteria fall into three categories: (1) performance issues, (2) representational issues, and (3) communication issues. This paper also assesses four non-linear AI planners (NOAH, NONLIN, SIPE and TWEAK) based on a study of the published literature and on communication (via electronic mail, meetings and correspondence) with their developers

[1]  David Chapman,et al.  Planning for Conjunctive Goals , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Mark Chignell,et al.  Expert Systems For Experts , 1988 .

[3]  Gerald Jay Sussman,et al.  A Computer Model of Skill Acquisition , 1975 .

[4]  Mark Drummond,et al.  Exploiting temporal coherence in nonlinear plan construction , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[5]  Austin Tate,et al.  O-Plan: The open Planning Architecture , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Boyd C. Paulson MAN-COMPUTER CONCEPTS FOR PLANNING AND SCHEDULING , 1972 .

[7]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  Practical planning - extending the classical AI planning paradigm , 1989, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[8]  David P. Miller,et al.  Hierarchical planning involving deadlines, travel time, and resources , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[9]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Investigating the utility of artificial intelligence techniques for automatic generation of construction project plans , 1989 .

[10]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  Can AI planners solve practical problems? , 1990, Comput. Intell..

[11]  Mark Fox Proceedings of the sixth conference on Artificial intelligence applications , 1990 .

[12]  Austin Tate,et al.  Generating Project Networks , 1977, IJCAI.

[13]  Vladimir Lifschitz,et al.  ON THE SEMANTICS OF STRIPS , 1987 .

[14]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  A centralized approach for representing and resolving interactions among multi-agent tasks while planning hierarchically , 1990, Sixth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications.

[15]  John Wylie Lloyd,et al.  Foundations of Logic Programming , 1987, Symbolic Computation.