The fog of innovation: Innovativeness and deviance in developing new clinical testing equipment

Even when innovators know they are working with a potential breakthrough innovation, they face formidable difficulties in assessing the exact ways it will be innovative as well as deviant in regard to extant systems, business and practices. This finding emerges from our case study that spans the 40-year history of an ongoing and by now potentially radical innovation in automated and miniaturized liquid processing. We analyze the changes in the system-to-be and its relationship to its future contexts throughout this period and show how the developers were able to reliably predict technical compatibility, the outcome, the interface points and effects towards the intended environment only some distance ahead. This 'fog of innovation' presents a management challenge not duly met by instruments available in innovation literature.

[1]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[2]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[3]  Robin Williams,et al.  Social Shaping of Technology: Frameworks, Findings and Implications for Policy, with Glossary of Social Shaping Concepts , 2002 .

[4]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[5]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[6]  John Tosh,et al.  The Pursuit of History: Aims, Methods and New Directions in the Study of Modern History , 1999 .

[7]  Dries. L. T. Hegger,et al.  Niche Management and its Contribution to Regime Change: The Case of Innovation in Sanitation , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[9]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[10]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[11]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[12]  Jan van den Ende,et al.  Technological transformations in history: how the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes , 1999 .

[13]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis , 2004 .

[14]  Robin Williams.  Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy , 2002 .

[15]  Johan Schot,et al.  Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management , 2002 .

[16]  Anique Hommels,et al.  Techno therapy or nurtured niches? Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations , 2007 .

[17]  Arie Rip,et al.  Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency , 1998 .

[18]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[19]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  J. Kohnen,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant , 2006 .

[21]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[22]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Shaping technology, guiding policy: concepts, spaces and tools , 2002 .

[23]  Helen M. Smith,et al.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction 3rd Edition , 2006 .

[24]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies , 2008 .

[25]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Users' Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology , 2006 .

[26]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[27]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .

[28]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[29]  L. Rosenfeld.  Four Centuries of Clinical Chemistry , 2018 .

[30]  T. P. Hughes.  The Seamless Web: Technology, Science, Etcetera, Etcetera , 1986 .

[31]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability , 2004 .

[32]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[33]  G. O'Connor.  Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects , 1998 .

[34]  Barend van der Meulen,et al.  Getting new technologies together: studies in making sociotechnical order , 1998 .

[35]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[36]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Managing Breakthrough Innovations : theoretical implications from-and forthe sociology of science and technology , 2003 .

[37]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[38]  Brian Elliott,et al.  Technology and social process , 1988 .

[39]  James Fleck,et al.  Configurations: Crystallizing contingency , 1993 .

[40]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[41]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[42]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[43]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[44]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[45]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..