Early Season Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Standard and Mini Watermelon Grafted onto Several Commercially Available Cucurbit Rootstocks

Grafting watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) is a common practice in many parts of the world and has recently received increased interest in the United States. The present study was designed to evaluate early season growth, yield, and fruit quality of watermelon in response to grafting and in the absence of known disease pressure in a fumigated system. Field experiments were conducted using standard and mini watermelons (cv. Exclamation and Extazy, respectively) grafted onto 20 commercially available cucurbit rootstocks representing four species: giant pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima), summer squash (Cucurbita pepo), bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), and interspecific hybrid squash [ISH (C. maxima × Cucurbita moschata)]. Nongrafted ‘Exclamation’ and ‘Extazy’ were included as controls. To determine early season growth, leaf area was measured at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after transplant (WAT). At 1 WAT, nongrafted ‘Exclamation’ produced the smallest leaf area; however, at 3 WAT, nongrafted ‘Exclamation’ produced the largest leaf area in 2015, and no differences were observed in 2016. Leaf area was very similar among rootstocks in the ‘Extazy’ study, with minimal differences observed. Marketable yield included fruit weighing ≥9 and ≥3 lb for ‘Exclamation’ and ‘Extazy’, respectively. In the ‘Exclamation’ study, highest marketable yields were observed in nongrafted ‘Exclamation’, and ‘Exclamation’ grafted to ‘Pelops’, ‘TZ148’, and ‘Coloso’, and lowest marketable yields were observed when using ‘Marvel’ and ‘Kazako’ rootstocks, which produced 47% and 32% of nongrafted ‘Exclamation’ yield, respectively. In the ‘Extazy’ study, the highest marketable yield was observed in nongrafted ‘Extazy’, and ‘Kazako’ produced the lowest yields (48% of nongrafted ‘Extazy’). Fruit quality was determined by measuring fruit acidity (pH), soluble solids concentration (SSC), lycopene content, and flesh firmness from a sample of two fruit from each plot from the initial two harvests of each year. Across both studies, rootstock had no effect on SSC or lycopene content. As reported in previous studies, flesh firmness was increased as a result of grafting, and nongrafted ‘Exclamation’ and ‘Extazy’ had the lowest flesh firmness among standard and mini watermelons, respectively. The present study evaluated two scions with a selection of 20 cucurbit rootstocks and observed no benefits in early season growth, yield, or phytonutrient content. Only three of 20 rootstocks in each study produced marketable yields similar to the nongrafted treatments, and no grafted treatment produced higher yields than nongrafted ‘Exclamation’ or ‘Extazy’. Because grafted seedlings have an associated increase in cost and do not produce increased yields, grafting in these optimized farming systems and using fumigated soils does not offer an advantage in the absence of soilborne pathogens or other stressors that interfere with watermelon production.

[1]  C. Sims,et al.  Fruit quality of seedless watermelon grafted onto squash rootstocks under different production systems. , 2017, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[2]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Vegetable Grafting as a Tool to Improve Drought Resistance and Water Use Efficiency , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[3]  C. Krarup,et al.  Yield and Quality of Grafted Watermelon Grown in a Field Naturally Infested with Fusarium Wilt , 2016 .

[4]  E. Rosskopf,et al.  Grafting and Paladin Pic-21 for Nematode and Weed Management in Vegetable Production , 2016, Journal of nematology.

[5]  C. Miles,et al.  Evaluating Grafted Watermelon for Verticillium Wilt Severity, Yield, and Fruit Quality in Washington State , 2015 .

[6]  M. Kyriacou,et al.  Quality and Postharvest Performance of Watermelon Fruit in Response to Grafting on Interspecific Cucurbit Rootstocks , 2015 .

[7]  S. Daley,et al.  Fatty Alcohol Application to Control Meristematic Regrowth in Bottle Gourd and Interspecific Hybrid Squash Rootstocks Used for Grafting Watermelon , 2014 .

[8]  Christina E. Wells,et al.  Grafted Watermelon Root Length Density and Distribution under Different Soil Moisture Treatments , 2013 .

[9]  A. Turhan,et al.  Influence of rootstocks on yield and fruit characteristics and quality of watermelon , 2012, Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology.

[10]  J. Thies,et al.  Defense Mechanisms Involved in Disease Resistance of Grafted Vegetables , 2012 .

[11]  Chieri Kubota,et al.  Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds , 2010 .

[12]  M. Oda,et al.  Grafting of Herbaceous Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , 2010 .

[13]  A. Levi,et al.  Grafting Effects on Vegetable Quality , 2008 .

[14]  Chieri Kubota,et al.  Vegetable Grafting: History, Use, and Current Technology Status in North America , 2008 .

[15]  Dean G. Liere,et al.  Grafting Methods for Watermelon Production , 2008 .

[16]  Y. Rouphael,et al.  Yield, Mineral Composition, Water Relations, and Water Use Efficiency of Grafted Mini-watermelon Plants Under Deficit Irrigation , 2008 .

[17]  Merritt J. Taylor,et al.  COST BENEFIT ANALYSES OF USING GRAFTED WATERMELON TRANSPLANTS FOR FUSARIUM WILT DISEASE CONTROL , 2008 .

[18]  V. Cebolla,et al.  The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation by methyl bromide for control of Fusarium wilt , 2004 .

[19]  D. Maynard Triploid Watermelon Seed Orientation Affects Seedcoat Adherence on Emerged Cotyledons , 1989, HortScience.

[20]  P. Perkins-Veazie,et al.  Rootstock Effects on Plant Vigor and Watermelon Fruit Quality , 2007 .

[21]  M. Sugiyama,et al.  THE HISTORY AND PRESENT STATE OF THE GRAFTING OF CUCURBITACEOUS VEGETABLES IN JAPAN , 2007 .

[22]  Angela R. Davis,et al.  A Rapid Hexane‐free Method for Analyzing Lycopene Content in Watermelon , 2003 .