A novel fast knee cartilage segmentation technique for T2 measurements at MR imaging--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T(2) relaxation time assesses non-invasively cartilage composition and can be used as early biomarker for knee osteoarthritis. Most knee cartilage segmentation techniques were primarily developed for volume measurements in DESS or SPGR sequences. For T(2) quantifications, these segmentations need to be superimposed on T(2) maps. However, given that these procedures are time consuming and require manual alignment, using them for analysis of T(2) maps in large clinical trials like the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is challenging. A novel direct segmentation technique (DST) for T(2) maps was therefore developed. Using the DST, T(2) measurements were performed and compared with those determined with an established segmentation superimposition technique (SST). MR images of five OAI participants were analysed with both techniques three times by one reader and five different images sets additionally with DST three times by two readers. Segmentations and T(2) measurements of one knee required on average 63±3min with DST (vs 302±13min for volume and T(2) measurements with SST). Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between the two segmentation techniques, respectively the two readers. Reproducibility errors of both techniques (DST vs SST) were similar (P>0.05) for whole knee cartilage mean T(2) (1.46% vs 2.18%), laminar (up to 2.53% vs 3.19%) and texture analysis (up to 8.34% vs 9.45%). Inter-reader reproducibility errors of DST were higher for texture analysis (up to 15.59%) than for mean T(2) (1.57%) and laminar analysis (up to 2.17%). Due to these results, the novel DST can be recommended for T(2) measurements in large clinical trials like the OAI.

[1]  R Gullapalli,et al.  The osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance methods and results. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  S. Majumdar,et al.  The feasibility of characterizing the spatial distribution of cartilage T(2) using texture analysis. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Patellar cartilage: T2 values and morphologic abnormalities at 3.0-T MR imaging in relation to physical activity in asymptomatic subjects from the osteoarthritis initiative. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of MRI T2 knee cartilage laminar organization in a subset of patients from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  R Burgkart,et al.  Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  M. Reiser,et al.  Global and regional reproducibility of T2 relaxation time measurements in human patellar cartilage , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Erika Schneider,et al.  The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  V J Schmithorst,et al.  Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  H. Potter,et al.  T2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  S. Krause,et al.  Combined Image Processing Techniques for Characterization of MRI Cartilage of the Knee , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[11]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  K. Kaufman,et al.  Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Olaf Dietrich,et al.  T2 measurement in articular cartilage: Impact of the fitting method on accuracy and precision at low SNR , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Spatial analysis of magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation times improves classification between subjects with and without osteoarthritis. , 2009, Medical physics.