External costs from vessel emissions at port: a review of the methodological and empirical state of the art†

ABSTRACT The accurate calculation of external costs from vessel emissions and shipping (as it happens with transport) strongly depends on parameters such as location, the time of the day and vessel operative. Thus, the use of a full bottom-up approach and granular traffic details is suggested. The latter may represent a substantial improvement in the resolution of shipping activity, energy demand, emissions and cost data being the latter essential for better regulations. The revised work identifies the Impact Pathway Approach (IPA) as the best-practice bottom-up methodology for calculating site-specific external costs derived from shipping air emissions. It has been widely adopted, among others, over major European studies (CAFE, BeTa, NEEDS and HEATCO). Also, it shows that due to costly and complex requirements of creating a shipping and harbour-specific bottom-up approach, external cost calculation based on tonne per euro factors obtained from European Studies (top-down approach) has been widely accepted. Moreover, methodological improvements and the possible achievement of refined estimations (IPA) dedicated to ports and shipping are strongly suggested, as these may improve information quality used for environmental policy and measures that contribute to the internalisation of externality costs.

[1]  Athanasios Denisis,et al.  An Economic Feasibility Study of Short Sea Shipping Including the Estimation of Externalities with Fuzzy Logic. , 2009 .

[2]  M. Sanabra,et al.  Manoeuvring and hotelling external costs: enough for alternative energy sources? , 2014 .

[3]  Ciuffo Biagio,et al.  Analytical Framework to Regulate Air Emissions from Maritime Transport , 2010 .

[4]  Maja Škurić,et al.  Ship emissions and their externalities in cruise ports , 2015, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[5]  Noureddine Berrah,et al.  China's envisaged renewable energy target : the green leap forward , 2010 .

[6]  Alex L. Marten,et al.  Estimating the social cost of non-CO2 GHG emissions: Methane and nitrous oxide , 2012 .

[7]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Transportation Emissions: Some Basics , 2016 .

[8]  Miola Apollonia,et al.  External Costs of Transportation. Case Study: Maritime Transport , 2009 .

[9]  F. Teng,et al.  Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies: A regional study of the cement industry in China , 2013 .

[10]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update , 2013 .

[11]  Barbara Schlomann,et al.  External Costs of Road, Rail and Air Transport - a Bottom-Up Approach , 1998 .

[12]  P. T. Lee,et al.  External Costs of Domestic Container Transportation: Short‐Sea Shipping versus Trucking in Taiwan , 2010 .

[13]  Kevin P Gallagher,et al.  International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  L. Ferreira,et al.  Valuing Air Quality Impacts of Transportation: A Review of Literature , 2006 .

[15]  W. Krewitt,et al.  Technical Paper n ° 7 . 4-RS 1 b “ Description of updated and extended draft tools for the detailed site-dependent assessment of external costs ” , 2008 .

[16]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[17]  Po-Hsing Tseng,et al.  Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: The case of Kaohsiung , 2012 .

[18]  Carolien Kroeze,et al.  Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories : Chapter 4. Agriculture , 1997 .

[19]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  Baseline Scenarios for the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Programme , 2004 .

[20]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States , 2007 .

[21]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[22]  Garth A. Gibson,et al.  Update of the handbook on external costs of transport: final report for the European Commission: DG-MOVE , 2014 .

[23]  Karina Funk,et al.  ELECTRIC VERSUS CONVENTIONAL VEHICLES: SOCIAL COSTS AND BENEFITS IN FRANCE , 1999 .

[24]  C. Kroeze N2O from animal waste. Methodology according to IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. , 1997 .

[25]  Beatriz Tovar,et al.  Environmental cost and eco-efficiency from vessel emissions in Las Palmas Port , 2015 .

[26]  Domenico Rossetti,et al.  New Elements for the Assessment of External Costs from Energy Technologies , 2001 .

[27]  K. Cullinane,et al.  Atmospheric Emissions from Shipping: The Need for Regulation and Approaches to Compliance , 2013 .

[28]  A. Maragkogianni,et al.  Evaluating the social cost of cruise ships air emissions in major ports of Greece , 2015 .

[29]  Ernestos Tzannatos,et al.  Ship emissions and their externalities for Greece , 2010 .

[30]  E. Tzannatos Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus – Greece , 2010 .

[31]  R. Smokers,et al.  Handbook on estimation of external cost in the transport sector: produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT) , 2007 .

[32]  Su Song,et al.  Ship emissions inventory, social cost and eco-efficiency in Shanghai Yangshan port , 2014 .

[33]  David Philip McArthur,et al.  Ships in a city harbour: an economic valuation of atmospheric emissions , 2013 .

[34]  Beatriz Tovar,et al.  Port-city exhaust emission model: An application to cruise and ferry operations in Las Palmas Port , 2015 .