Sustainable green electricity, technological innovation, and ecological footprint: Does democratic accountability moderate the nexus?

[1]  M. Rahman,et al.  Effects of corruption, technological innovation, globalisation, and renewable energy on carbon emissions in asian countries , 2022, Utilities Policy.

[2]  Abaid Ullah Zafar,et al.  Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry , 2022, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.

[3]  S. Raza,et al.  The roles of hydro, nuclear and biomass energy towards carbon neutrality target in China: A policy-based analysis , 2022, Energy.

[4]  F. Shahzad,et al.  Energy transition for meeting ecological goals: Do economic stability, technology, and government stability matter? , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[5]  Jiafeng Gu,et al.  Sharing economy, technological innovation and carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese cities , 2022, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.

[6]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[7]  A. Caglar,et al.  A path towards environmental sustainability: The role of clean energy and democracy in ecological footprint of Pakistan , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  U. Pata,et al.  Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor , 2022, Progress in Nuclear Energy.

[9]  Fanchen Meng,et al.  Economic growth, technology, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: Investigating the non-linear impacts of economic complexity , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  I. Ozturk,et al.  The roles of energy efficiency improvement, renewable electricity production, and financial inclusion in stimulating environmental sustainability in the Next Eleven countries , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[11]  J. Popp,et al.  Financial Inclusion, Technological Innovations, and Environmental Quality: Analyzing the Role of Green Openness , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[12]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Exploring the linkage between export diversification and ecological footprint: evidence from advanced time series estimation techniques , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: What is the role of economic policy uncertainty? , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[14]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Effects of economic complexity, economic growth, and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: the role of democratic accountability , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[15]  T. Adebayo,et al.  The long-run relationship between energy consumption, oil prices, and carbon dioxide emissions in European countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: evidence from Portugal , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development , 2021, Sustainable Development.

[18]  N. Mahmood,et al.  The corruption-emissions nexus: Do information and communication technologies make a difference? , 2021 .

[19]  G. Rubbaniy,et al.  Carbon neutrality target for leading exporting countries: On the role of economic complexity index and renewable energy electricity. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Zhijun Yan,et al.  Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[21]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Role of trade openness, export diversification, and renewable electricity output in realizing carbon neutrality dream of China. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[23]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[24]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[25]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Does financial inclusion limit carbon dioxide emissions? Analyzing the role of globalization and renewable electricity output , 2021 .

[26]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: The role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries , 2021 .

[27]  Jiahai Yuan,et al.  Investigating the impact of renewable electricity consumption on sustainable economic development: a panel ARDL approach , 2021 .

[28]  R. Brini.  Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, economic growth and climate change: Evidence from a panel of selected African countries , 2021 .

[29]  A. Caglar,et al.  Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break , 2020 .

[30]  K. Ehigiamusoe.  A disaggregated approach to analyzing the effect of electricity on carbon emissions: Evidence from African countries , 2020 .

[31]  Pradeep Kautish,et al.  Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia , 2020 .

[32]  S. Erdoğan,et al.  Does democracy help reduce environmental degradation? , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[33]  Qaisar Abbas,et al.  The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: What should be the priorities in light of COP 21 Agreements? , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Sakiru Adebola Solarin,et al.  The prominence of renewable and non-renewable electricity generation on the environmental Kuznets curve: A case study of Ethiopia , 2020 .

[35]  O. Usman,et al.  Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of energy consumption and democratic accountability , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  U. Pata.  Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[37]  A. Caglar,et al.  The importance of renewable energy consumption and FDI inflows in reducing environmental degradation: Bootstrap ARDL bound test in selected 9 countries , 2020 .

[38]  S. Nathaniel,et al.  The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries , 2020 .

[39]  Muntasir Murshed.  Revisiting the deforestation-induced EKC hypothesis: the role of democracy in Bangladesh , 2020, GeoJournal.

[40]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach , 2020 .

[41]  O. Usman,et al.  Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[42]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli,et al.  Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  Malepekola Precious Monaheng,et al.  The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[44]  F. Bekun,et al.  Electricity consumption, urbanization, and economic growth in Nigeria: New insights from combined cointegration amidst structural breaks , 2020, Journal of Public Affairs.

[45]  M. Destek,et al.  Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[46]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[47]  Fateh Bélaïd,et al.  Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, environmental degradation and economic development: Evidence from Mediterranean countries , 2019, Energy Policy.

[48]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  H. Hdom.  Examining carbon dioxide emissions, fossil & renewable electricity generation and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of South American countries , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[50]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Determinants of carbon emissions in Pakistan’s transport sector , 2019, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[51]  O. Usman,et al.  Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[52]  Le Hoang Phong.  Globalization, Financial Development, and Environmental Degradation in the Presence of Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from ASEAN-5 Countries , 2019 .

[53]  M. Slimane,et al.  Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[54]  Shouro Dasgupta,et al.  The influence of institutions, governance, and public opinion on the environment: Synthesized findings from applied econometrics studies , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[55]  Huiming Zhu,et al.  The heterogeneous effect of democracy, political globalization, and urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in G20 countries: Evidence from panel quantile regression , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[56]  C. Mensah,et al.  The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014 , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[57]  Tsangyao Chang,et al.  Nexus between clean energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions , 2018 .

[58]  U. Pata,et al.  A multivariate causality analysis between electricity consumption and economic growth in Turkey , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[59]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? , 2018 .

[60]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan , 2017 .

[61]  Zhike Lv.  The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: Does the level of income matter? , 2017 .

[62]  Fateh Bélaïd,et al.  Environmental degradation, renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth: Assessing the evidence from Algeria , 2017 .

[63]  Daniel Balsalobre,et al.  Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[64]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  What role of renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption and output is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in MENA region? , 2014 .

[65]  E. Dumitrescu,et al.  Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels , 2012 .

[66]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Cities lead the way in climate–change action , 2010, Nature.

[67]  Serena Ng,et al.  Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends , 2008, 0805.1768.

[68]  Y. H. Farzin,et al.  Democracy and Environmental Quality , 2006 .

[69]  J. Westerlund.  Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect , 2006 .

[70]  E. Rosa,et al.  STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts , 2003 .

[71]  M. Pesaran.  A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence , 2003 .

[72]  P. Pedroni.  Current Version : July 25 , 1999 CRITICAL VALUES FOR COINTEGRATION TESTS IN HETEROGENEOUS PANELS WITH MULTIPLE REGRESSORS * , 1999 .

[73]  E. Rosa,et al.  Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  Rodger A. Payne,et al.  Freedom and the Environment , 1995 .

[75]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics , 1980 .