Establishing IUCN Red List Criteria for Threatened Ecosystems

Abstract The potential for conservation of individual species has been greatly advanced by the International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) development of objective, repeatable, and transparent criteria for assessing extinction risk that explicitly separate risk assessment from priority setting. At the IV World Conservation Congress in 2008, the process began to develop and implement comparable global standards for ecosystems. A working group established by the IUCN has begun formulating a system of quantitative categories and criteria, analogous to those used for species, for assigning levels of threat to ecosystems at local, regional, and global levels. A final system will require definitions of ecosystems; quantification of ecosystem status; identification of the stages of degradation and loss of ecosystems; proxy measures of risk (criteria); classification thresholds for these criteria; and standardized methods for performing assessments. The system will need to reflect the degree and rate of change in an ecosystem's extent, composition, structure, and function, and have its conceptual roots in ecological theory and empirical research. On the basis of these requirements and the hypothesis that ecosystem risk is a function of the risk of its component species, we propose a set of four criteria: recent declines in distribution or ecological function, historical total loss in distribution or ecological function, small distribution combined with decline, or very small distribution. Most work has focused on terrestrial ecosystems, but comparable thresholds and criteria for freshwater and marine ecosystems are also needed. These are the first steps in an international consultation process that will lead to a unified proposal to be presented at the next World Conservation Congress in 2012. Establecimiento de Criterios para la Lista Roja de UICN de Ecosistemas Amenazados Resumen El potencial para la conservación de muchas especies ha avanzado enormemente porque la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (UICN) ha desarrollado criterios objetivos, repetibles y transparentes para evaluar el riesgo de extinción que explícitamente separa la evaluación de riesgo de la definición de prioridades. En el IV Congreso Mundial de Conservación en 2008, el proceso comenzó a desarrollar e implementar estándares globales comparables para ecosistemas. Un grupo de trabajo establecido por la UICN ha formulado un sistema inicial de categorías y criterios cuantitativos, análogos a los utilizados para especies, para asignar niveles de amenaza a ecosistemas a niveles local, regional y global. Un sistema final requerirá de definiciones de ecosistemas; cuantificación del estatus de ecosistemas; identificación de las etapas de degradación y pérdida de los ecosistemas; medidas de riesgo (criterios) alternativas; umbrales de clasificación para esos criterios y métodos estandarizados para la realización de evaluaciones. El sistema deberá reflejar el nivel y tasa de cambio en la extensión, composición, estructura y funcionamiento de un ecosistema, y tener sus raíces conceptuales en la teoría ecológica y la investigación empírica. Sobre la base de esos requerimientos y la hipótesis de que el riesgo del ecosistema es una función del riesgo de las especies que lo componen, proponemos un conjunto de 4 criterios: declinaciones recientes en la distribución o funcionamiento ecológica, pérdida total histórica en la distribución o funcionamiento ecológico, distribución pequeña combinada con declinación, o distribución muy pequeña. La mayor parte del trabajo se ha concentrado en ecosistemas terrestres, pero también se requieren umbrales y criterios comparables para ecosistemas dulceacuícolas y marinos. Estos son los primeros pasos de un proceso de consulta internacional que llevará a una propuesta unificada que será presentada en el próximo Congreso Mundial de Conservación en 2012.

[1]  E. Odum Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .

[2]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[3]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[4]  F. Essl,et al.  ROTE LISTE GEFÄHRDETER BIOTOPTYPEN ÖSTERREICHS , 2002 .

[5]  Mark E. Taylor,et al.  National frameworks for marine conservation — a hierarchical geophysical approach , 2000 .

[6]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change , 2006 .

[7]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Assessing the Threat Status of Ecological Communities , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  G. Allen,et al.  Freshwater Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Biogeographic Units for Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation , 2008 .

[9]  J. Balch,et al.  Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems , 2006, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[10]  H. Mooney,et al.  Toward a Global Biodiversity Observing System , 2008, Science.

[11]  S. Quader,et al.  Improvements to the Red List Index , 2007, PloS one.

[12]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  European Vegetation Survey: update on progress , 1995 .

[13]  R. Cowling,et al.  Nature Conservation Requires More than a Passion for Species , 2004 .

[14]  Ben Collen,et al.  Tracking Progress Toward the 2010 Biodiversity Target and Beyond , 2009, Science.

[15]  A. Shvidenko Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis , 2005 .

[16]  J. Paal Rare and threatened plant communitiesof Estonia , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  Don Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification , 2009 .

[19]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Limits to the use of threatened species lists , 2002 .

[20]  J. Terborgh Faunal Equilibria and the Design of Wildlife Preserves , 1975 .

[21]  J. Olden,et al.  Process-Based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems , 2010 .

[22]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[23]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Measuring Global Trends in the Status of Biodiversity: Red List Indices for Birds , 2004, PLoS biology.

[24]  M. Clayton,et al.  Legacies of historical land use on regional forest composition and structure in Wisconsin, USA (mid-1800s-1930s-2000s). , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[26]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities ED. W.F LAURANCE AND R.O. BIERREGAARD, JR 616 pp., ISBN 0 226 46898 4 US$105.00/£83.95 (cloth); 0 226 46899 2 US$38.00/£30.50 (paper), Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1997 , 1998, Environmental Conservation.

[27]  Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria , 2005 .

[28]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[29]  Katherine J. LaJeunesse Connette,et al.  Conservation Biology , 2009, The Quarterly review of biology.

[30]  R. Watson,et al.  Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Aerial Photography: A Rapidly Evolving Tool for Ecological Management , 2010 .

[32]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystems , 2007 .

[33]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Value of the IUCN Red List , 2003 .

[34]  R. Noss,et al.  Ecosystems as conservation targets. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Richard O. Bierregaard,et al.  Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities , 1999 .

[36]  E. Wilson,et al.  The Barometer of Life , 2010, Science.

[37]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Evolutionary Biology and Community Ecology , 1996 .

[38]  Jill J. Cress,et al.  A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Conterminous United States , 2009 .

[39]  R. Cowling,et al.  Using the Species-Area Relationship to Set Baseline Targets for Conservation , 2004 .

[40]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Tropical dry forests in Venezuela: assessing status, threats and future prospects , 2008, Environmental Conservation.

[41]  Scott P. Sowa,et al.  A GAP ANALYSIS AND COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR RIVERINE ECOSYSTEMS OF MISSOURI , 2007 .

[42]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[43]  S. Stuart,et al.  Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species , 2009 .

[44]  D. Keith The interpretation, assessment and conservation of ecological communities. , 2009 .

[45]  B. Collen,et al.  National Red Listing Beyond the 2010 Target , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[46]  Walter V. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis , 2005 .

[47]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Developing products for conservation decision‐making: lessons from a spatial biodiversity assessment for South Africa , 2007 .

[48]  Jennifer L. Molnar,et al.  Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas , 2007 .

[49]  James S. Clark,et al.  Predicting biodiversity change: outside the climate envelope, beyond the species-area curve. , 2006, Ecology.