Assessment of Factors Associated With Internal Carotid Injury in Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Importance Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery does not typically occur as an isolated circumstance but often is the result of multiple factors. Objective To assess the factors associated with ICA injury in an effort to reduce its occurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants This quality improvement study used a multicenter root cause analysis of ICA injuries sustained during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery performed at 11 tertiary care centers across 4 continents (North America, South America, Europe, and Asia) from January 1, 1993, to December 31, 2018. A fishbone model was built to facilitate the root cause analysis. Patients who underwent an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach that carried a substantial potential risk of an ICA injury were included in the analysis. A questionnaire was completed by surgeons at the centers to assess relevant human, patient, process, technique, instrument, and environmental factors associated with the injury. Main Outcomes and Measures Root cause analysis of demographic, human, patient, process, technique, instrument, and environmental factors as well as mortality and morbidity data. Results Twenty-eight cases of ICA injury occurred during 7160 expanded endoscopic endonasal approach procedures (incidence of 0.4%). The mean age of the patients was 49 years, with a female to male predominance ratio of 1.8:1 (18 women to 10 men). Anatomical (23 [82%]), pathological (15 [54%]), and surgical resection (26 [93%]) factors were most frequently reported. The surgeon's mental or physical well-being was reported as inadequate in 4 cases (14%). Suboptimal imaging was reported in 6 cases (21%). The surgeon's experience level was not associated with ICA injury. The ICA injury was associated with use of powered or sharp instruments in 20 cases (71%), and use of new instruments or technology in 7 cases (25%). Two patients (7%) died in the operating room, and 3 (11%) were alive with neurological deficits. Overall, patient-related factors were the most frequently reported risk factors (in 27 of 28 cases [96%]). Factors associated with ICA injury catalyzed a list of preventive recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that human factors were associated with intraoperative ICA injuries; however, they were usually accompanied by other deficiencies. These findings suggest that identifying risk factors is crucial for preventing such injuries. Preoperative planning and minimizing the potential for ICA injury also appear to be essential.

[1]  Frank Willem Jansen,et al.  Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons Performing Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[2]  M S Hallbeck,et al.  The impact of intraoperative microbreaks with exercises on surgeons: A multi-center cohort study. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  P. Parker,et al.  The impact of sleep deprivation in military surgical teams: a systematic review , 2016, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps.

[4]  R. Carrau,et al.  Injury of the Internal Carotid Artery During Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Prevention and Management Protocol. , 2016, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[5]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Live surgical demonstrations: An endangered species. , 2015, Urologic oncology.

[6]  Arthur D. Smith,et al.  Performing in the surgical amphitheater of today: perception of urologists conducting live case demonstrations. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[7]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  EAU policy on live surgery events. , 2014, European urology.

[8]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Live surgical education: a perspective from the surgeons who perform it , 2014, BJU international.

[9]  G. Maddern,et al.  Effect of fatigue on laparoscopic skills: a comparative historical cohort study , 2014, ANZ journal of surgery.

[10]  W. Hosemann,et al.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery , 2013, GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.

[11]  Chris Brown,et al.  Image-Guided Surgery Influences Perioperative Morbidity from Endoscopic Sinus Surgery , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  A. Javer,et al.  Computer or not? Use of image guidance during endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis at St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, and meta-analysis , 2013, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[13]  P. Gardner,et al.  Quality control approach to cerebrospinal fluid leaks. , 2013, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[14]  Lai Wei,et al.  Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[15]  J. Fernandez-Miranda,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[16]  Richard C. Karl,et al.  Adverse events: root causes and latent factors. , 2012, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[17]  P. Wormald,et al.  Carotid artery injury after endonasal surgery. , 2011, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[18]  P. Crowe,et al.  Optimizing the operating theatre environment , 2010, ANZ journal of surgery.

[19]  A. Sama,et al.  Light at the end of the tunnel: the learning curve associated with endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery. , 2010, Skull base : official journal of North American Skull Base Society ... [et al.].

[20]  P. Gardner,et al.  Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  D. Lombardi,et al.  Endoscopic Surgery for Malignant Tumors of the Sinonasal Tract and Adjacent Skull Base: A 10-year Experience , 2008, American journal of rhinology.

[22]  J. Mcaleer,et al.  Measuring competence in endoscopic sinus surgery. , 2008, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[23]  F. Esposito,et al.  Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. , 2008, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[24]  Felice Esposito,et al.  AVOIDANCE OF CAROTID ARTERY INJURIES IN TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY WITH THE DOPPLER PROBE AND MICRO‐HOOK BLADES , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[25]  D. Mazzatenta,et al.  The Endoscopic Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach for the Treatment of Cranial Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[26]  J. Inamasu,et al.  Iatrogenic carotid artery injury in neurosurgery , 2005, Neurosurgical Review.

[27]  P. Gardner,et al.  Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. , 2005, Neurosurgical focus.

[28]  E. Laws Vascular Complications of Transsphenoidal Surgery , 1999, Pituitary.

[29]  G. Mcgarry,et al.  Audit-derived guidelines for training in endoscopic sinonasal surgery (ESS)--protecting patients during the learning curve. , 2003, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[30]  J Raymond,et al.  Arterial injuries in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma; the role of angiography and endovascular treatment. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[31]  A. Ragin,et al.  Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. , 1997, Neurosurgery.