A corpus-based analysis of the Swedish passive alternation

This article presents a corpus-based investigation of the motivations behind the use of the s -passive and the bli -passive in contemporary written Swedish. Following a probabilistic approach to language variation and building on observations in the literature, we examine the simultaneous effects of semantic and syntactic factors by means of a multivariate statistical analysis. Our corpus sample includes 1,197 passive sentences of three Swedish verbs, which alternate in their use of the passive ( acceptera ‘accept’, behandla ‘treat’ and valja ‘choose’). The results suggest that the choice of passive form is significantly associated with five predictor variables: Subject Animacy, Subject Number, Modal Verb, Av -phrase (‘by’-phrase) and Aktionsart. Among these, Subject Animacy and Modal Verb appear to yield the strongest impact effect on the choice of passive form. The study adds to earlier research in that it allows for a more accurate analysis of the simultaneous effect and relative strength of each factor on the speaker's choice of one of the passive forms.

[1]  Ida Larsson.  Inte helt passiv : Konstruktion med få + particip i tal och skrift , 2012 .

[2]  Lars Heltoft,et al.  Grammatik over det Danske Sprog , 1993 .

[3]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English , 2010 .

[4]  Werner Abraham,et al.  Passivization and typology : form and function , 2006 .

[5]  Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen,et al.  Particles at the Semantics/pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues, a Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs , 2008 .

[6]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results , 2003 .

[7]  Elisabet Engdahl.  Valet av passivform i modern svenska , 2001 .

[8]  E. Husband.  5: Some Structural Analogies Between Existential Interpretation And Telicity , 2012 .

[9]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Anu Laanemets,et al.  The passive voice in written and spoken Scandinavian , 2009 .

[11]  Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen,et al.  Danish Passives and Subject Positions as a Mood System--A Content Analysis; and Paradigmatic Structure, Word Order and Grammaticalization. ROLIG-Papir 54. , 1995 .

[12]  Benjamin Lyngfelt,et al.  Demoting the Agent: Passive, middle and other voice phenomena , 2006 .

[13]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Research Methods in Language Variation and Change: Using convergent evidence from psycholinguistics and usage , 2013 .

[14]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[15]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Svenska Akademiens grammatik , 1999 .

[16]  J. Fox.  Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models , 2003 .

[17]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Elisabet Engdahl,et al.  Semantic and syntactic patterns in Swedish passives , 2006 .

[19]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[20]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[21]  Johanna Barddal,et al.  Passive in Icelandic – compared to Mainland Scandinavian , 2003 .