The Extent of Information: Its Relevance for Random Utility Models

This paper examines the effect of the researcher's definition of a recreator's choice set on the parameter and welfare estimates from standard random utility models. Three choice set definitions are compared: choice sets based on all alternatives within the survey, those alternatives within a specified distance from the respondents home, and alternatives familiar to the individual. We show that parameter and welfare estimates are sensitive to the definition of the choice set. Welfare measures of site closures differ in varying ways depending on the familiarity level of the sites in question.

[1]  Daniel J. Phaneuf,et al.  Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  J. Whitehead,et al.  SE MRFSS: Distance and Catch Based Choice Sets , 1999 .

[3]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand. , 1998 .

[4]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand , 1997 .

[5]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Influence of Choice Set Considerations in Modeling the Benefits From Improved Water Quality , 1995 .

[6]  Daniel Hellerstein,et al.  A Theoretical Foundation for Count Data Models , 1993 .

[7]  V. Smith.  Welfare Effects, Omitted Variables, and the Extent of the Market , 1993 .

[8]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Choice set formation for destination choice modelling , 1992 .

[9]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Randomly Drawn Opportunity Sets in a Random Utility Model of Lake Recreation , 1992 .

[10]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  Modeling the Choice of Choice Set in Discrete-Choice Random-Utility Models , 1991 .

[11]  P. Spiller,et al.  On the Extent of the Market: Wholesale Gasoline in the Northeastern United States , 1986 .

[12]  P. Caulkins.  An empirical study of the recreational benefits generated by a water quality improvement. , 1983 .

[13]  W. Hanemann.  Applied Welfare Analysis with Qualitative Response Models , 1982 .

[14]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .