Characteristics of fetuses evaluated due to suspected anencephaly: a population-based cohort study in southern Brazil.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Anencephaly is considered to be the most common type of neural tube defect. Our aim was to assess the clinical and gestational features of a cohort of fetuses with suspected anencephaly. DESIGN AND SETTING Population-based retrospective cohort study in a referral hospital in southern Brazil. METHODS The sample consisted of fetuses referred due to suspected anencephaly, to the Fetal Medicine Service of Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas, between January 2005 and September 2013. Clinical, radiological, pathological and survival data were gathered. RESULTS Our sample was composed of 29 fetuses. The diagnosis of suspected anencephaly was made on average at 21.3 weeks of gestation. Seven fetuses had malformations that affected other organs, and these included oral clefts (n = 4) and congenital heart defects (n = 2). In 16 cases, there was termination of pregnancy (n = 12) or intrauterine death (n = 4). Regarding those who were born alive (n = 13), all of them died in the first week of life. After postnatal evaluation, the diagnosis of anencephaly was confirmed in 22 cases (75.9%). Other conditions included amniotic band disruption complex (6.9%), microhydranencephaly (6.9%), merocrania (3.4%) and holoprosencephaly (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS Different conditions involving the cranial vault may be confused with anencephaly, as seen in our sample. However, these conditions also seem to have a poor prognosis. It seems that folic acid supplementation is not being properly performed.

[1]  P. Trevisan,et al.  Trisomy 18 and neural tube defects. , 2013, Pediatric Neurology.

[2]  Rafael Fabiano Machado Rosa,et al.  Trisomía 18 (síndrome de Edwards): revisión de los aspectos clínicos, etiológicos, pronósticos y éticos , 2013 .

[3]  A. Gunduz,et al.  Novel NDE1 homozygous mutation resulting in microhydranencephaly and not microlyssencephaly , 2012, neurogenetics.

[4]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Limb–body wall defect. Is there a defensible hypothesis and can it explain all the associated anomalies? , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[5]  N. Montenegro,et al.  Revisiting Acrania: Same Phenotype, Different Aetiologies , 2010, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[6]  M. Muenke,et al.  Holoprosencephaly: recommendations for diagnosis and management , 2010, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[7]  Ze-Zhong Tang,et al.  3D ultrasound in assessment of growth and development of frontal lobes in children with perinatal brain injury , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  B. Dickens,et al.  Prenatal management of anencephaly , 2008, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  E. Boltshauser,et al.  Spontaneous pregnancy outcome after prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  H. Ekerbicer,et al.  Postmortem evaluation of 220 prenatally diagnosed fetuses with neural tube defects: detection of associated anomalies in a Turkish population , 2006, Prenatal diagnosis.

[11]  H. Dolk EUROCAT: 25 years of European surveillance of congenital anomalies , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[12]  S. Bianca,et al.  Prenatal and postnatal findings of acrania , 2005, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  F. Calzolari,et al.  Anencephaly: MRI findings and pathogenetic theories , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[14]  W. Sepulveda,et al.  First‐Trimester Echogenic Amniotic Fluid in the Acrania‐Anencephaly Sequence , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[15]  Maximilian F. Reiser,et al.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, technique, anatomical considerations and a review of fetal abnormalities , 2002, European Radiology.

[16]  E. Romero-Velarde,et al.  Report and review of the fetal brain disruption sequence , 2001, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[17]  R. Becker,et al.  Sonographic markers of exencephaly at 9 + 3 weeks of gestation , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  A Fenster,et al.  Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  P. Levy Amniotic bands. , 1998, Pediatrics in review.

[20]  A. Weissman,et al.  Fetal acrania: Five new cases and review of the literature , 1997, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[21]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Crown-chin length in normal and anencephalic fetuses at 10 to 14 weeks' gestation. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[23]  I. Kjaer,et al.  Diagnostic distinction between anencephaly and amnion rupture sequence based on skeletal analysis. , 1994, Journal of medical genetics.

[24]  B. Källén,et al.  International study of sex ratio and twinning of neural tube defects. , 1994, Teratology.

[25]  R. Rosa,et al.  Trisomy 18: review of the clinical, etiologic, prognostic, and ethical aspects. , 2013, Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo.

[26]  M. Werler,et al.  Epidemiologic analysis of maternal factors and amniotic band defects. , 2003, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[27]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Ultrasound screening for anencephaly at 10–14 weeks of gestation , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[28]  Edwards Jg,et al.  A counseling dilemma involving anencephaly, acrania and amniotic bands. , 1992 .

[29]  J. Edwards,et al.  A counseling dilemma involving anencephaly, acrania and amniotic bands. , 1992, Genetic Counseling.

[30]  B. Warf,et al.  Neural-tube defects. , 1978, Lancet.