Fluid–structure interaction analysis of a morphing vertical axis wind turbine

Abstract There has been much recent interest in the development of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWTs), especially for use in off-grid or off-shore electricity generation, due to inherent advantages over the more popular horizontal axis types. Although there have been a number of recent attempts to increase efficiency of VAWTs using active and passive blade pitch control strategies, these designs come at an increased upfront cost, detracting from the simplistic allure of the VAWT design. This study investigates the feasibility of a flexible bladed (or morphing) VAWT, wherein individual blades are able to passively adapt to local flow conditions and serve as a pitch control mechanism to increase rotor efficiency. Using a finite volume fluid–structure interaction algorithm, a rigid VAWT is simulated with good agreement with existing experimental data, then compared to several other geometrically identical morphing designs with varying material flexibility. All simulated flexible rotors achieved higher efficiency than the standard (rigid) one, with efficiency gains up to 9.6% for the VAWT geometry investigated herein. The results suggest that the morphing rotor design can have significant advantages over the rigid design particularly in part-load scenarios, and is also likely to increase the self-starting abilities of the VAWT.

[1]  Sergio D. Felicelli,et al.  A fluid-structure interaction method for highly deformable solids , 2010 .

[2]  F. Menter Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 1992 .

[3]  L. Long,et al.  3-D time-accurate CFD simulations of wind turbine rotor flow fields , 2006 .

[4]  David MacPhee,et al.  Experimental and Fluid Structure Interaction analysis of a morphing wind turbine rotor , 2015 .

[5]  Kenji Tanaka,et al.  Floating axis wind turbines for offshore power generation—a conceptual study , 2011 .

[6]  David MacPhee,et al.  Flexible Blade Design for Wind Energy Conversion Devices , 2014 .

[7]  W. Wall,et al.  Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation , 2008 .

[8]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: Geometry modeling and aerodynamics , 2011 .

[9]  Francesco Balduzzi,et al.  Feasibility analysis of a Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbine installation in the rooftop of a building , 2012 .

[10]  P. Cooper,et al.  Development and Analysis of a Novel Vertical Axis Wind Turbine , 2004 .

[11]  Zied Driss,et al.  Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction in a stirred vessel equipped with an anchor impeller , 2011 .

[12]  Ning Qin,et al.  Wind tunnel and numerical study of a small vertical axis wind turbine , 2008 .

[13]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Evaluation of different turbine concepts for wind power , 2008 .

[14]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Stability of a coupling technique for partitioned solvers in FSI applications , 2008 .

[15]  A. Gosman,et al.  Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting , 1986 .

[16]  Philip Cardiff,et al.  Development of the Finite Volume Method for Hip Joint Stress Analysis , 2012 .

[17]  Liu Shuqin,et al.  Magnetic Suspension and Self-pitch for Vertical-axis Wind Turbines , 2011 .

[18]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[19]  Seung Jo Kim,et al.  Efficiency improvement of a new vertical axis wind turbine by individual active control of blade motion , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[20]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Effects of stator vanes on power coefficients of a zephyr vertical axis wind turbine , 2010 .

[21]  F. Saeed,et al.  H-Darrieus Wind Turbine with Blade Pitch Control , 2009 .

[22]  S. Tullis,et al.  Power performance of canted blades for a vertical axis wind turbine , 2011 .

[23]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades , 2011 .

[24]  F. Trivellato,et al.  On the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy criterion of rotating grids in 2D vertical-axis wind turbine analysis , 2014 .

[25]  Lyle N. Long,et al.  3-D Time-Accurate Inviscid and Viscous CFD Simulations of Wind Turbine Rotor Flow Fields , 2009 .

[26]  Philip Cardiff,et al.  Development of a Finite Volume Based Structural Solver for Large Rotation of Non-Orthogonal Meshes , 2012 .

[27]  Xiaowei Deng,et al.  Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines , 2014 .

[28]  Joachim Schöberl,et al.  NETGEN An advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules , 1997 .

[29]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[30]  Seung Jo Kim,et al.  Optimization of cycloidal water turbine and the performance improvement by individual blade control , 2009 .

[31]  J. Halleux,et al.  An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions , 1982 .

[32]  Yi Mei,et al.  Aerodynamic Model of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine with Wind Speed Self-Adapting in Drag-Mode , 2011 .

[33]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[34]  Stefano Mauro,et al.  2D CFD Modeling of H-Darrieus Wind Turbines Using a Transition Turbulence Model , 2014 .

[35]  David MacPhee,et al.  Fluid‐structure interaction of a morphing symmetrical wind turbine blade subjected to variable load , 2013 .

[36]  F. Menter ZONAL TWO EQUATION k-w TURBULENCE MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC FLOWS , 1993 .

[37]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .