Single cell mechanics: stress stiffening and kinematic hardening.

Cell mechanical properties are fundamental to the organism but remain poorly understood. We report a comprehensive phenomenological framework for the complex rheology of single fibroblast cells: a superposition of elastic stiffening and viscoplastic kinematic hardening. Despite the complexity of the living cell, its mechanical properties can be cast into simple, well-defined rules. Our results reveal the key role of crosslink slippage in determining mechanical cell strength and robustness.

[1]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[2]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[3]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Mechano-Coupling and Regulation of Contractility by the Vinculin Tail Domain , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Albrecht Ott,et al.  Rheological properties of the Eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton , 2007 .

[5]  Albrecht Ott,et al.  Shear rheology of a cell monolayer , 2007 .

[6]  Y. Bréchet,et al.  Peeling process in living cell movement under shear flow. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility , 1992 .

[8]  L Mahadevan,et al.  Nonlinear mechanics of soft fibrous networks , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  H. Green,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF THE GROWTH OF MOUSE EMBRYO CELLS IN CULTURE AND THEIR DEVELOPMENT INTO ESTABLISHED LINES , 1963, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Pablo Fernández,et al.  A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  D. Navajas,et al.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[12]  Alan K. Miller,et al.  Unified constitutive equations for creep and plasticity , 1987 .

[13]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[14]  G I Zahalak,et al.  Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[15]  G. Oster,et al.  Cell motility driven by actin polymerization. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[16]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  STATISTICAL BREAKAGE OF SINGLE PROTEIN A-IGG BONDS REVEALS CROSSOVER FROM SPONTANEOUS TO FORCE-INDUCED BOND DISSOCIATION , 1999 .

[18]  W. Prager,et al.  Mechanik isotroper Körper im plastischen Zustand , 1934 .

[19]  Shengyuan Yang,et al.  Reversible and repeatable linear local cell force response under large stretches. , 2005, Experimental cell research.

[20]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[21]  S. Nemat-Nasser.  Plasticity: A Treatise on Finite Deformation of Heterogeneous Inelastic Materials , 2004 .

[22]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[23]  K. Grosh,et al.  Remodeling of biological tissue: Mechanically induced reorientation of a transversely isotropic chain network , 2004, q-bio/0411037.

[24]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[25]  K. Krausz,et al.  Unified constitutive laws of plastic deformation , 1996 .