Quality improvement of email communication in work groups and organizations by reflection

Email communication in work groups and organizations suffers from ill-composed messages. In this paper we introduce two approaches aiming to improve the overall quality of email communication by means of reflection. For this purpose, we determine, rate and classify quality problems as encountered in today's email communication. Subsequently, we derive criteria to rate the quality of email communication, both objectively as well as subjectively. The results of these ratings are then presented to the authors of email messages to encourage them to improve their email communication behaviour. Preliminary results suggest that our approach might have the potential to overcome problems of email communication caused by ill-composed messages.

[1]  R. Wayne Pace.  The Organizational Learning Audit , 2002 .

[2]  Robert J. Hall.  How to avoid unwanted email , 1998, CACM.

[3]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations , 1999 .

[4]  S. McGregor,et al.  Leadership and the New Science , 2004 .

[5]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Understanding email use: predicting action on a message , 2005, CHI.

[6]  James Morris,et al.  Markets for attention: will postage for email help? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[7]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  Generative Knowledge and Self-Organized Learning , 2000 .

[8]  Brian Dumaine,et al.  Mr. Learning Organization. , 1994 .

[9]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[10]  P. Senge.  The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization , 2014 .

[11]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[12]  B. Allenby.  Industrial ecology : policy framework and implementation , 1999 .

[13]  John Redding,et al.  Hardwiring the learning organization , 1997 .

[14]  Linda Levine,et al.  Integrating Knowledge and Processes in A Learning Organization , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[15]  William J. Rothwell,et al.  The Workplace Learner: How to Align Training Initiatives with Individual Learning Competencies. , 2002 .

[16]  Lisa-Henri Kirkland,et al.  Challenges in designing, implementing and operating an environmental management system , 1999 .

[17]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[18]  Richard H. Deane,et al.  Creating a Learning Project EnvironmentAligning Project Outcomes with Customer Needs , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  Martin Mühlpfordt,et al.  Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: the learning protocol approach , 2002, CSCL.

[20]  C. Argyris.  Good communication that blocks learning , 1994 .

[21]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[22]  Martha A. Gephart,et al.  Learning Organizations Come Alive. , 1996 .

[23]  Toward an Understanding of the Learning Community , .

[24]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[25]  Susanne Voigt.  E-Mail-Kommunikation in Organisationen : eine explorative Studie zu individuellen Nutzungsstrategien , 2003 .

[26]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  The Relevance of Firm-Learning Theories to the Design and Evaluation of Manufacturing Modernization Programs , 1998 .

[27]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[28]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Evaluating manufacturing strategy for a learning organization: a case , 1999 .

[29]  Ray Dawson,et al.  Understanding email interaction increases organizational productivity , 2003, CACM.

[30]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[31]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[32]  Vinton G. Cerf.  Spam, spim, and spit , 2005, CACM.

[33]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[34]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.