A mathematical model of doxorubicin penetration through multicellular layers.

Inadequate drug delivery to tumours is now recognised as a key factor that limits the efficacy of anticancer drugs. Extravasation and penetration of therapeutic agents through avascular tissue are critically important processes if sufficient drug is to be delivered to be therapeutic. The purpose of this study is to develop an in silico model that will simulate the transport of the clinically used cytotoxic drug doxorubicin across multicell layers (MCLs) in vitro. Three cell lines were employed: DLD1 (human colon carcinoma), MCF7 (human breast carcinoma) and NCI/ADR-Res (doxorubicin resistant and P-glycoprotein [Pgp] overexpressing ovarian cell line). Cells were cultured on transwell culture inserts to various thicknesses and doxorubicin at various concentrations (100 or 50 microM) was added to the top chamber. The concentration of drug appearing in the bottom chamber was determined as a function of time by HPLC-MS/MS. The rate of drug penetration was inversely proportional to the thickness of the MCL. The rate and extent of doxorubicin penetration was no different in the presence of NCI/ADR-Res cells expressing Pgp compared to MCF7 cells. A mathematical model based upon the premise that the transport of doxorubicin across cell membrane bilayers occurs by a passive "flip-flop" mechanism of the drug between two membrane leaflets was constructed. The mathematical model treats the transwell apparatus as a series of compartments and the MCL is treated as a series of cell layers, separated by small intercellular spaces. This model demonstrates good agreement between predicted and actual drug penetration in vitro and may be applied to the prediction of drug transport in vivo, potentially becoming a useful tool in the study of optimal chemotherapy regimes.

[1]  M. Kelley,et al.  DNA repair proteins as molecular targets for cancer therapeutics. , 2008, Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry.

[2]  I. Tannock,et al.  The influence of expression of P‐glycoprotein on the penetration of anticancer drugs through multicellular layers , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[3]  Rachel Schiff,et al.  Crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and the HER tyrosine kinase receptor family: molecular mechanism and clinical implications for endocrine therapy resistance. , 2008, Endocrine reviews.

[4]  G. Jansen,et al.  Drug transporters: recent advances concerning BCRP and tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2008 .

[5]  K. Hicks,et al.  Multicellular membranes as an in vitro model for extravascular diffusion in tumours. , 1996, The British journal of cancer. Supplement.

[6]  I. Tannock,et al.  The penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue as a function of cellular adhesion and packing density of tumor cells. , 2006, Cancer research.

[7]  J. Double,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of PK1 and doxorubicin in experimental colon tumor models with differing responses to PK1. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[8]  I. Tannock,et al.  Drug penetration in solid tumours , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[9]  D. Scudiero,et al.  Cell line designation change: multidrug-resistant cell line in the NCI anticancer screen. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  P. Loadman,et al.  Evaluation of a novel in vitro assay for assessing drug penetration into avascular regions of tumours. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  G. Eytan,et al.  Flip-flop of doxorubicin across erythrocyte and lipid membranes. , 1997, Biochemical pharmacology.

[12]  Kristian Pietras,et al.  High interstitial fluid pressure — an obstacle in cancer therapy , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  G. Eytan Mechanism of multidrug resistance in relation to passive membrane permeation. , 2005, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[14]  Ian F Tannock,et al.  Limited penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue: a potential cause of resistance of solid tumors to chemotherapy. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[15]  M. Moasser,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes in cancer: intrinsic and acquired. , 2008, Seminars in oncology.

[16]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Resistance to adriamycin in multicellular spheroids. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  P. Hunter,et al.  An experimental and mathematical model for the extravascular transport of a DNA intercalator in tumours. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  G. Eytan,et al.  Transport of anthracyclines and mitoxantrone across membranes by a flip-flop mechanism. , 2005, Biochemical pharmacology.

[19]  P. Kuchel,et al.  Mechanism of action of P-glycoprotein in relation to passive membrane permeation. , 1999, International review of cytology.

[20]  I. Tannock,et al.  Penetration of anticancer drugs through solid tissue: a factor that limits the effectiveness of chemotherapy for solid tumors. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.