On the lingual organization of the German vowel system.

A hybrid PARAFAC and principal-component model of tongue configuration in vowel production is presented, using a corpus of German vowels in multiple consonant contexts (fleshpoint data for seven speakers at two speech rates from electromagnetic articulography). The PARAFAC approach is attractive for explicitly separating speaker-independent and speaker-dependent effects within a parsimonious linear model. However, it proved impossible to derive a PARAFAC solution of the complete dataset (estimated to require three factors) due to complexities introduced by the consonant contexts. Accordingly, the final model was derived in two stages. First, a two-factor PARAFAC model was extracted. This succeeded; the result was treated as the basic vowel model. Second, the PARAFAC model error was subjected to a separate principal-component analysis for each subject. This revealed a further articulatory component mainly involving tongue-blade activity associated with the flanking consonants. However, the subject-specific details of the mapping from raw fleshpoint coordinates to this component were too complex to be consistent with the PARAFAC framework. The final model explained over 90% of the variance and gave a succinct and physiologically plausible articulatory representation of the German vowel space.

[1]  Christian Kroos,et al.  Phonetic evidence for the phonological status of the tense–lax distinction in German , 1996 .

[2]  Philip Hoole.  Issues in the acquisition , processing , reduction and parameterization of articulographic data , 2001 .

[3]  J R Westbury,et al.  Vowel posture normalization. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M H Cohen,et al.  Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Bro.  PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .

[7]  Wendy Linker.  WPP, No. 56: Articulatory and Acoustic Correlates of Labial Activity in Vowels: A Cross-linguistic Study , 1982 .

[8]  K. Moll,et al.  A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities , 1976 .

[9]  G Papcun,et al.  Two cross-linguistic factors underlying tongue shapes for vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Factor analysis of tongue shapes. , 1971, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P. Hoole.  ARTICULATORY-ACOUSTIC RELATIONS IN GERMAN VOWELS , 1999 .

[12]  P Ladefoged,et al.  Individual differences in vowel production. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  S. Wood,et al.  The acoustical significance of tongue, lip, and larynx maneuvers in rounded palatal vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Shinji Maeda,et al.  Compensatory Articulation During Speech: Evidence from the Analysis and Synthesis of Vocal-Tract Shapes Using an Articulatory Model , 1990 .

[15]  H. Law.  Research methods for multimode data analysis , 1984 .

[16]  Phil Hoole,et al.  Control of larynx height in vowel production , 1998, ICSLP.

[17]  T. Kaburagi,et al.  Determination of sagittal tongue shape from the positions of points on the tongue surface. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Laver.  The phonetic description of voice quality , 1980 .

[19]  M. Jackson.  Analysis of tongue positions: language-specific and cross-linguistic models. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Pierre Badin,et al.  Determining tongue articulation: from discrete fleshpoints to continuous shadow , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[21]  M. Stone,et al.  Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D J Ostry,et al.  A dynamic biomechanical model for neural control of speech production. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Hani Yehia,et al.  A parametric three-dimensional model of the vocal-tract based on MRI data , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[24]  P. Hoole,et al.  PATTERNS OF LINGUAL VARIABILITY IN GERMAN VOWEL PRODUCTION , 1995 .

[25]  S. Maeda,et al.  From EMG to Formant Patterns of Vowels: The Implication of Vowel Spaces , 1994, Phonetica.