Network closure among sellers and buyers in social commerce community

Social commerce communities connect sellers and buyers and allow them to seek and share product information. Although the extant literature has realized its economic value, there has been little research on the antecedents of network closure in social commerce community with longitudinal network data. Based on the evolving network data from Taobao.com and network closure theory, this research analyzes network closure among sellers and buyers in social commerce community and we find that the drivers of network closure in social commerce communities vary across different types of relationships. Specifically, (1) from the buyers' perspective, they are more likely to follow other buyers and sellers through observational learning and contagion; (2) from the sellers' perspective, the homophily, reciprocity, and structural equivalence are the general mechanisms that drive them following both buyers and sellers; (3) the results from the robustness checks show that the findings would not be affected by the sample size or the duration of the observations.This study contributes to the ongoing study of social networks analysis in social shopping and social commerce. Furthermore, the ties studied in this research connect both sellers and buyers, which are different from the ties of friendship in most social network literatures. Findings from this research will also help marketers better understand how social commerce community networks evolve and adjust their relationship management strategies.

[1]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[2]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[3]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. , 1996 .

[4]  E. Muller,et al.  Decomposing the Value of Word-of-Mouth Seeding Programs: Acceleration vs. Expansion , 2012 .

[5]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[6]  Stanton G. Cort,et al.  Information Asymmetry and Levels of Agency Relationships , 1998 .

[7]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Alan A. Block,et al.  Build it, and they will Come , 1999 .

[9]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Online Social Interactions: A Natural Experiment on Word of Mouth versus Observational Learning , 2010 .

[11]  M. Newman.  Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Dean Karlan,et al.  Community Size and Network Closure , 2007 .

[13]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Folksonomies and clustering in the collaborative system CiteULike , 2007, 0710.2835.

[14]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison , 2011 .

[15]  John S. Hughes,et al.  Information Asymmetry, Diversification, and Cost of Capital , 2007 .

[16]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[17]  Diana C. Robertson,et al.  Compound Relationships between Firms , 2007 .

[18]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[20]  J. Sheth,et al.  Customer Relationship Management: Emerging Practice, Process, and Discipline , 2002 .

[21]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .

[22]  David P. Myatt,et al.  Innovation Diffusion in Heterogeneous Populations: Contagion, Social Influence, and Social Learning , 2009 .

[23]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[25]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Deriving Value from Social Commerce Networks , 2009 .

[26]  Christian Holsing,et al.  Modeling Consumer Purchasing Behavior in Social Shopping Communities with Clickstream Data , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[27]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[28]  V. Kumar,et al.  Practice Prize Winner - Creating a Measurable Social Media Marketing Strategy: Increasing the Value and ROI of Intangibles and Tangibles for Hokey Pokey , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Social selection and peer influence in an online social network , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[31]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Hedonic shopping motivations , 2003 .

[32]  Florian Stahl,et al.  Modeling Multiple Relationships in Social Networks , 2011 .

[33]  Renata Gonçalves Curty,et al.  Social commerce: Looking back and forward , 2011, ASIST.

[34]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[35]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[36]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[37]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[38]  A. Rao,et al.  No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality , 2000 .

[39]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[40]  Armin Falk,et al.  A Theory of Reciprocity , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Value Creation in Buyer–Seller Relationships: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results from a Supplier's Perspective , 2001 .

[42]  Charles M. C. Lee,et al.  Spreads, Depths, and the Impact of Earnings Information: An Intraday Analysis , 1993 .

[43]  Yifan Hu,et al.  Visualizing dynamic data with maps , 2011, 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium.