A Simulation of the Structure of Academic Science

The contemporary structure of scientific activity, including the publication of papers in academic journals, citation behaviour, the clustering of research into specialties and so on has been intensively studied over the last fifty years. A number of quantitative relationships between aspects of the system have been observed. This paper reports on a simulation designed to see whether it is possible to reproduce the form of these observed relationships using a small number of simple assumptions. The simulation succeeds in generating a specialty structure with ‘areas’ of science displaying growth and decline. It also reproduces Lotka's Law concerning the distribution of citations among authors. The simulation suggests that it is possible to generate many of the quantitative features of the present structure of science and that one way of looking at scientific activity is as a system in which scientific papers generate further papers, with authors (scientists) playing a necessary but incidental role. The theoretical implications of these suggestions are briefly explored.

[1]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[2]  A. Bowley.  The Analysis of Economic Time Series , 1942, Nature.

[3]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[6]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[7]  Bernard F. Reilly,et al.  The Invisible Colleges , 1971 .

[8]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[9]  H. Echols.  Scientific Community , 1972, Nature.

[10]  John N. Warfield,et al.  World dynamics , 1973 .

[11]  Gn Gilbert,et al.  The quantitative study of science , 1974 .

[12]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Essay Review: The Quantitative Study of Science: an Examination of the Literature , 1974 .

[13]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata , 1986 .

[14]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[15]  A. Harding,et al.  Dynamic microsimulation models: problems and prospects , 1991 .

[16]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the limits: Global collapse or a sustainable future , 1993 .

[17]  Kyriakos M. Kontopoulos.  The logics of social structure: Bibliography , 1993 .

[18]  J. Doran,et al.  The EOS Project: modelling Upper Palaeolithic social change , 1994 .

[19]  N. Gilbert,et al.  Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life , 1995 .

[20]  Violating an Occupational Sex-Stereotype: Israeli Women Earning Engineering Degrees: , 1996 .

[21]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence , 1996, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[22]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Dynamic Social Impact , 1996 .

[23]  Rainer Hegselmann.  Cellular Automata in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[24]  Klaus G. Troitzsch,et al.  Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view , 1996 .

[25]  Edmund Chattoe.  Modeling economic interaction using a genetic algorithm , 1997 .

[26]  L. Codispoti.  The limits to growth , 1997, Nature.

[27]  Steven Patrick,et al.  Simulating Correctional Disturbances: The Application of Organization Control Theory to Correctional Organizations via Computer Simulation , 1999, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..